for determining whetheran employer should beheld vicariously liablefor the mishandling ofpersonal data by anemployee.This test was that thewrongful conduct mustbe so closely connectedwith acts the employeewas authorised to dothat it could be regardedas done by the employeewhile acting in theordinary...
He claimed Bellawings was vicariously liable for their defamatory statements because the emails were sent by those colleagues in the course of their employment. The emails alleged drunk and inappropriate behaviour, sexual assault, abandonment of duties and coercion of an emp...
Ghignone, Roberto
aEmployers are vicariously liable under the doctrine of "respondeat superior" for the negligent acts or omissions by their employees in the course of employment. The key phrase is "in the course of employment". For an act to be considered within the course of employment, it must either be ...
Assesses the Court of Appeal decision in Brink's Global Services Inc v Igrox Ltd on whether an employer was vicariously liable to a third party for the the... PDJ Morgan - 《Social Science Electronic Publishing》 被引量: 1发表: 2016年 Vicarious Liability 'On the Move': TheEnglish Supreme...
For instance, a parent sometimes can be vicariously liable for the harmful acts of a child and an employer sometimes can be vicariously liable for 代理的责任是,当一个人是对另一个人的疏忽行动负责时,即使第一个人没有直接地负责伤害。 例如,父母可以有时是代理对孩子的有害的行动负责,并且雇主可以...
arguing that it could not be held vicariously liable for the actions of Davis because she was not Vance's supervisor. The district court granted the University's motion, applying Seventh Circuit precedent to conclude that "[a] supervisor is someone with the power to direct...
AN EMPLOYER could not be vicariously liable for the acts of his employee performed in the course of his employment which were not in themselves tortious, but which only constituted a tort when combined with other acts which were not performed in the course of his employment. The House of Lord...
3d 723 (Cal. 2014), in determining whether franchisor Domino’s could be held vicariously liable for harassing behavior by a franchisee’s employee. The Domino’s Court declined to find a joint employment or agency relationship relating to the particu...
Specifically, it is unlawful for an employer or fellow employee to sexually harass another employee.8Employers can be vicariously liable for their employees’ actions unless they have taken all reasonable steps to prevent such conduct.9 It is also unlawful for an individual to sexually...