Assesses the Court of Appeal decision in Brink's Global Services Inc v Igrox Ltd on whether an employer was vicariously liable to a third party for the theft of its property by an employee or whether this liability only arose if the employer had undertaken a duty to the third party that ...
Vicarious liability is a legal doctrine in which you can be held liable for the wrongful acts of third parties, such as your employees or agents. In California, if a court finds vicariously liable, you may be ordered to pay for the victim's medical bills
aWhere the requirement of vicarious liability is met, the employer will be liable for the acts of his employee regardless of his own culpability and regardless of whether he owns the injured person any duty of care. 正在翻译,请等待...[translate]...
The purpose of vicarious liability is to hold larger entities responsible for the wrongful actions of their employees or agents. This is to ensure that these larger entities are held accountable for their actions and that the victims of the wrongful actions can receive some form of compensationWhat...
Furthermore, the provision was not concerned with the carrier's own employees but only with the carrier's vicarious liability for the acts of other parties 此外,这项规定与承运人本人的受雇人无关,而只是涉及承运人代为其他当事人的作为承担的赔偿责任。 MultiUn While this may not universally be...
The Liability of Employers for the Harassment of Employees by Non-employees Employees who suffer work-related harassment by non-employees in circumstances in which the employer does not protect them can neither institute action against their employer on the basis of vicarious liability, nor in terms...
aVicarious liability is a legal doctrine that assigns liability for an injury to a person who did not cause the injury but who has a particular legal relationship to the person who did act negligently. 代理的责任是为伤害分配责任到人没有造成伤害,但是的法律教条谁有一个特殊法律关系对行动得疏忽地...
- employers' vicarious liability for the torts of violent employees A Glassbrook 被引量: 0发表: 2005年 Master and Servant—Vicarious Liability—Master's Indemnity against Servant http://journals.cambridge.org/cover_images/CLJ/CLJ.jpg JA Jolowicz - 《Cambridge Law Journal》 被引量: 0发表: ...
be held responsible for Chris' actions, since they take special precautions to prevent this sort of thing from happening and did not know about the harassment. When could Caroline utilize a special affirmative defense that might prevent her company's vicarious liability for Chris' sexual harassmen...
Actively monitor your workplace, respond to complaints from employees and other parties such as vendors and suppliers, and provide a clear method for registering complaints. Document these actions in detail.4 Create employee manuals with thorough explanations of rules and expected employee conduct. Ensu...