Sugarman J (2015) Ethics and germline gene editing. EMBO Rep 16: 879 - 880Sugarman, Jeremy. "Ethics and germline gene editing." EMBO Reports 16 (2015): 879-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed]Ethics and germline gene editing[J] . Jeremy Sugarman.EMBO rep . 2015 (8)...
Olson, S. International Summit on Human Gene Editing: A Global Discussion (The National Academis of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2015); http://go.nature.com/2pwNV7w National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance (The Nat...
Credit: CC0 Public Domain The first reported instance of germline gene editing in humans was bad science as well as bad ethics, according to a commentary publishing April 30 in the open-access journalPLOS Biologyby Haoyi Wang of the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and...
With the advent of efficient, easy-to-use genome editing by CRISPR–Cas9, editing human embryos is now possible, providing tremendous opportunities to study gene function and cell fate in early human development. The technique can also be used to modify the human germline. Unresolved questions abo...
Ethics of Human Genome Editing Advances in human genome editing, in particular the development of the clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 method, have led t... BS Coller - 《Annual Review of Medicine》 被引量: 0发表: 2019年 Unexpected Inheritance: Multiple Integrations...
- Research ethics: How safe is safe enough when bringing genome editing into clinical practice? Can basic research on germline editing lead to path dependency? New questions in embryo research: e.g., the moral status of nonviable embryos; revisiting the 14-days-rule. ...
"The ethical debate about what is now called human gene editing has gone on for more than 50 years," writes Dr. John H. Evans, co-director of the Institute for Practical Ethics at the University of California, San Diego. "For nearly that entire time, there has been consensus that a ...
germline gene editinggovernance mechanismresearch ethicsscientific misconductRecent reporting found that a number of scientists internationally knew about the experiment resulting in the birth of the first gene-edited babies well before the news broke. Because scientists have a responsibility to reveal such...
Ethics statement All participants provided written informed consent before their enrollment in the UK Biobank cohort. The UKBB study has received the approval from the North-West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee (MREC). Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no know...
Using a variety of methods, including stem cell culture and expansion, stem cell transplantation, genetic modification and gene editing, in vivo cell lineal tracking, the researchers confirmed existence of FGSCs in the postnatal ovaries in a variety of mammals, including humans, even old women ...