Title VII Race or National Origin Discrimination in Employment–Supreme Court CasesIntroduction to annotation, § 1Jury trial, § 20Layoff injunction, § 21Mechanic, § 7[a]Methadone, drug use policy, § 13Multiple regression analyses, § 9National origin discrimination, §§23,24Nepotism, § ...
The Court's decision in Muldrow v. St. Louis requires plaintiffs to prove "some injury" respecting employment terms or conditions in discrimination cases. April 22, 2024Alert On April 17, 2024, inMuldrow v. St. Louis, the U.S. Supreme Court held that in order to make out a Title VI...
InBostock v. Clayton County, the Court considered three different cases that were all argued before the Court in October 2019. In doing so, the Court sought to resolve a split in the federal circuit courts over the scope of Title VII’s protections for homosexual and transgender individuals. ...
The article focuses on issues surrounding U.S Supreme Court's categorization of Title VII of the U.S Civil Rights Act of 1964 as a tort. Topics discussed include Supreme Court cases decided during 2009-2013 that used tort principles for interpretation of anti-discrimination statutes, tort...
Under Title VII, a discriminatory job transfer is actionable if the transfer resulted in some harm with respect to an identifiable term or condition of employment. The harm suffered by the transferred employee need not be "significant" to maintain a Title VII claim. The U.S. Supreme Cou...
Posted in:Discrimination,Employment Law,Supreme Court Tagged:employment discrimination,gender discrimination,Title VII Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Postal Worker Who Quit Over Sunday Sabbath July 5, 2023 TweetShareShare On Thursday, June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gerald...
on the 1st question, and 1 hour on the 2d.In answering this exam, you should invoke prevailing law. Where divergent approaches may apply, you should select that which a majority of the Supreme Court currently accepts.Please bear in mind that conclusory answers (answers without analysis) ...
Supreme Court Adopts Narrow Definition of Supervisor under Title VIISudbury, Joshua
The Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 30, 2023, to “resolve a Circuit split over whether an employee challenging a transfer under Title VII must meet a heightened threshold of harm — be it dubbed significant, serious, or something similar.” Prior toMuldrow,...
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously held in Groff v. DeJoy, No. 22-174, that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) requires an employer that denies a religious accommodation to show that the burden of granting an accommodation would...