Supreme Court hears Title VII case; Exemption for small employers debated.Hofmann, Mark A
Title VII and the Unenvisaged Case: Is Anti-LGBTQ Discrimination Unlawful Sex Discrimination (2) the Supreme Court's and circuit courts' construction of the sex discrimination provision in the context of sex stereotyping and gender nonconformity discrimination as applied to the anti-LGBTQ discriminatio...
The Supreme Court, in response to the government's argument that the three provisions should be severed, allowing the other unchallenged parts of the rule to go into effect, agreed with the lower courts that "the new definition of sex discrimination is intertwined with and affects many other p...
Once the plaintiff establishes a prima facie case of disparate impact discrimination, the defendant bears the burden of production and persuasion in showing that an adverse employment practice is "job related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity. Courts have emphasized, ...
The Supreme Court ruled in Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1, 68 S. Ct. 836, 92 L. Ed. 1161 (1948), that no court or state officials have the power under law to take any action toward the enforcement of a racial covenant. In this case, a group of neighbors were bringing suit ...
被引量: 7发表: 2015年 Who Owns the Land? Litigants, Justices, Colonos, and Titleholders' Struggle to Define the Origins of Private Property in Colombia This article explores the origin of private property in the Colombian legal system. The authors use Supreme Court case law from the twentiet...
47. Crest, 479 US at 7. 48. Marjorie A. Silver, Evening the Odds: The Case firAttorneys' Fee Awards fir Administrative Resolution of Title VI And Title VII... MJ Davidson - 《Del.j.corp.l》 被引量: 0发表: 1993年 Administrative Leave as an Adverse Action for Title VII Retaliation:...
Supreme Court rolled back the constitutional right to abortion, the department and the Biden administration discussed changing the counseling and referral policies for its Title X project, as a new Oklahoma law outlawed abortion, according to court filings. The measure also made it a felony for a...
Bankruptcy, Chapters 7 & 13, are no stranger to Mr. Casey. He has practiced in the Bankruptcy Field since 1992. He also is not afraid to sue the IRS or others within your Bankruptcy Case (called an "Adversary Proceeding") and has done so many times. ...
Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on May 24, 1999, ruled (5–4) that, under Title IX of the Federal Education Amendments (1972), school boards are liable for failing to stop student-on-student sexual harassme