Supreme Court Victory for Employers Facing Title VII Retaliation ClaimsWeeden, C'Reda J
On Monday, June 15, the US Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, an employer who fires an employee for being gay or transgender violates that federal anti-discrimination statute. In Bostock v. Clayton County, the Court considered ...
Supreme Court Decision Turning to the statutory text of Title VII, the Court reversed the Eighth Circuit’s decision and vacated the judgment, stating that the text of Title VII does not impose a heightened threshold of harm on an employee challenging a transfer pursuant to Title VII. The...
Muldrow was backed by President Joe Biden's administration, which had urged the Supreme Court to endorse a broad application of Title VII. The Justice Department in a brief to the court said that discriminatory transfers always violate the law because they necessarily involve a change in...
Supreme Court of NSW + Follow Sorry, currently no updates on this topic. Check back again, we're constantly publishing new content, and: browse other law news topics here »
The court fights before the Supreme Court involved two groups of states that challenged three provisions of the rule: The first recognizes that Title IX's prohibition on sex discrimination covers gender identity; the second broadens the definition of "hostile-environment harassment" to include harassm...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted a request from Republican-led states to keep the controversial Trump-era immigration policy known as Title 42 in place for now, meaning that agents can keep rapidly expelling migrants at the southern border even as President Joe Biden and his adm...
The Chinese title of the article is: 最高人民法院对“软法”的适用:外国观察者的视角 | 跨境顾释 (with the English title of “A foreign observer comments on the ‘soft law’ of the Supreme People’s Court”). The hard work of my research assistant Sun Dongyu, one of our Peking ...
The court fights before the Supreme Court involved two groups of states that challenged three provisions of the rule: The first recognizes that Title IX's prohibition on sex discrimination covers gender identity; the second broadens the definition of "hostile-environment harassment" to include harassm...
An initial draft of the first judicial interpretation of the Civil Code (part 1) is in place, with the provisional title of “Supreme People’s Court Interpretation Concerning the Some Questions on the Application of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China (1) 《最高人民法院关于适...