ZFS vs. EXT4, Btrfs Linux Benchmarks Starting with the Gzip compression test, both EXT4 and Btrfs were noticeably faster than UFS+J and UFS+S. The two tested UFS configurations both took 27 seconds to compress a 2GB file while EXT4 and Btrfs both took just 18 seconds atop the same har...
I'm trying to replace my classic 4 disks raid5 ext4 with by a equivalent raidz1 What I've done so far: 1 - Added a 8TB on my 5th slot and format it with btrfs 2 - back up all my data on it with rsync, I got an avg write speed of 105-110MB/s on big files (HD movies,...
FreeBSD ZFS vs. Linux EXT4/Btrfs RAID With Twenty SSDsStorage2018-12-14 Taking ZFS For A Test Drive On Ubuntu 16.04 LTSSoftware2016-04-23 Some Quick Tests With ZFS, F2FS, Btrfs & Friends On Linux 4.4Software2016-01-20 A New Linux File-System Aims For Speed While Having ZFS/Btrfs-Like...
Antergos is not configuring a completely fault-tolerant drive mirror, and this is aknown problem. The ext4 partition holding the kernel is a single point of failure, apparently required for GRUB. In the event of the loss of /boot, the Live ISO could be used to access the zpool, but rest...
Wouldn’t Time Machine profit greatly speed-wise from ZFS Sure, but just that – speedups (which could probably be hacked around in many ways). I think Apple would want to go beyond of all that – like presenting to applications something else that a path and a stream of bytes. ...
“when”). We also need to consider that different filesystems treat inevitable failures differently. For example, ext4 and XFS react differently to fsync failures (after the fsync system call has been initiated, it is expected that the application’s buffer is going to be flushed to the ...
Hi all, I have a raidz2 array with 4x 2TB drives, non AF. At the beginning of the disks there is a small ext4 md-raid1 partition and the rest of the disks are assigned to the raidz2 pool. I have used ashift=12 at pool creation. My workst...