This article makes the case against the exclusionary rule from a "liberal" perspective. Moving beyond the inconclusive empirical data on the efficacy of the rule, it uses behavioral and motivational theory to demonstrate why the rule is structurally unable to deter individual police officers from ...
Everyman's Exclusionary Rule: The Exclusionary Rule and the Rule of Law (or Why Conservatives Should Embrace the Exclusionary Rule) Ohio State Journal of Criminal LawSundby, Scott E.
“The traditional rule was it’s safer to stay where you are, but that’s been fundamentally inverted,” says one headhunter. “The people who’ve been hurt the worst are those who’ve stayed too long.”26. When McGee announced his departure, his manner can best be ...
The movement for prohibition began with concerns in the early 19th century about the negative effects of drinking. The National Prohibition Act was ineffective and failed to control the distribution and use of alcohol, and led to an increase in organized crime. Still, it remained in effect until...
This relationship was built on and assumed a gender division of labor in which a male-breadwinner would provide financial support while a female-care giver would perform unpaid domestic labor to sustain the family. Contractually, those workers, either male or female, who deviate from this standard...
Furthermore, the financing for affordable homes was also addressed years ago. Those bills were enacted by widely bipartisan margins. One of those bills, for example, was signed by a Democratic president...
The court ruled that Google used the monopoly it gained through its contracts, to engage in exclusionary practices and violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act, the US antitrust law. It stated that there was no true competition in the Search market because Google offered its partners lucrative rev...
The movement for prohibition began with concerns in the early 19th century about the negative effects of drinking. The National Prohibition Act was ineffective and failed to control the distribution and use of alcohol, and led to an increase in organized crime. Still, it remained in effect until...
He argues that both torture and CIDT require infliction of severe pain and thus it must be the purpose for which severe pain was inflicted that distinguishes torture from CIDT. If the purposive element is key in distinguishing torture from CIDT, then there is no need to have separate ...
Thibault Schrepel has been kind enough to invite me to write a piece for his Concurrentialiste (see here). It was a good chance to explore some of the themes that are central to my ongoing research projects and to share ...