The Supreme Court has stopped the Biden administration from enforcing a requirement that employees at large businesses be vaccinated against COVID-19 or undergo weekly testing and wear a mask on the job.
The Supreme Court is seen in Washington, Nov. 2, 2024.J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is allowing a multibillion-dollar class action investors’ lawsuit to proceed against Facebook parent Meta, stemming from the privacy scandal involving the Cambridge Ana...
The 2024 National Court Presidents Conference report contains a summary of the latest policy on China Judgments Online, further developed in this notice: 持续深化司法公开,加大裁判文书上网力度,妥善解决文书网使用效果不佳等问题,平衡好文书公开与当事人合法权利、隐私保护之间的关系,加强人民法院案例库建设,更...
But the ruling will likely have impacts beyond climate policy. It was the latest in a string of decisions by the conservative court revolving around just how much authority is given to regulatory agencies. One example is the court’s turnback of OSHA’s attempt to require employers to make e...
The Supreme People’s Court (SPC), along with the Ministry of Justice, held a press conference on 9 September, reported here, to announce the publication of the 2023 annual report of judicial review of commercial arbitration. It was written by the SPC’s #4 Civil Division in collaboration ...
This term, which began in October 2023, follows two in which the Supreme Court handed down consequential decisionsunwinding the constitutional right to abortionandbringing to an end affirmative actionin higher education. The justiceskicked off this latest slateof cases with several involving administrativ...
On January 13, 2022, the Supreme Court issued its first rulings related to the Biden Administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandates. In the case of NFIB v. OSHA, by a vote of 6-3, the Court held that the COVID-19 vaccination and testing mandate issued by the Occupational Safety and ...
rights when they coerced and significantly encouraged platforms to suppress content related to COVID-19 vaccines and the election. Itnarrowed the scopeof the district court's order but said federal employees could not "coerce or significantly encourage" a platform's content-moderation decisions....
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit then determined that certain White House officials and the FBI violated free speech rights when they coerced and significantly encouraged platforms to suppress content related to COVID-19 vaccines and the election. Itnarrowed the scopeof Doughty's or...
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit then determined that certain White House officials and the FBI violated free speech rights when they coerced and significantly encouraged platforms to suppress content related to COVID-19 vaccines and the election. Itnarrowed the scopeof Doughty's or...