The latest updates and insights on the decisions that affect your congregation.The Editors There have been a number of US Supreme Court rulings since 2017 that are of interest to churches. Church Law & Tax has followed these cases closely, developing the following articles: A Pair of ...
Two recent appeals at the Ontario Divisional Court have confirmed that courts can rely on government-published recommendations concerning the COVID-19 vaccine when assessing the best interests of the child. BothA.V. v. C.V., 2023 ONSC 1634andSpencer v. Spenc...
Labor and Employment in Massachusetts (Pub. #81528, Release 44) – This release features a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling, First Circuit ruling plus updates on final rules and findings from US DOL and NLRB. Medina’s Bostwick Practice Manual (Pub. #00380, Release 134) – Chapter...
06/02 - Johnson Fistel Secures Another Significant Victory on Behalf of City of Roswell First Responders 05/27 - Spring 2020 The Monitor 05/27 - Johnson Fistel Welcomes New Attorney Oliver S. tum Suden 04/29 - Monthly Charges and Annual Passes During the COVID-19 Pandemic – Do Consume...
Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, and afterwards rejected by the Supreme Court for consideration.25 Recently, however, the Ecuadorian court authorized the plaintiffs to seize approximately $200 million worth of assets that belong to Chevron, who will enforce the ruling by receiving $96.3 ...
Is Biden's latest Covid-19 vaccine mandate for employers with more than 100 employees legal? Human Resources (HRIS)News+1 more Yes, there's solid legal ground.46% No, the mandate is illegal.41% I'm unsure.11% View Results 7.5k views3...
on-site that they had provided remotely during the organization’s initial COVID-19 response. (Ibid.) Thus, because the plaintiff had already demonstrated that they could perform the essential functions of the job remotely, the court held that the balance of hardship weighed in the plaintiff’s...
“an essential aspect of the asylum adjudication process for reasons related to fairness . . . and to the integrity of the asylum process itself.” However, theHonduran asylee later withdrew his applicationand appeal due to marriage to a U.S. Citizen, so Sessions has declared the ...
Since defendant did not oppose this affidavit, plaintiff’s testimony was taken as true by the Court when ruling on plaintiff’s summary judgment motion. Next, the Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for leave to amend his affirmative defenses. Defendant sought ...
In the case at issue, parties agreed on the situs: [77] “It was common ground before us that the claims which the claimants are seeking to pursue are to be regarded as situate in this jurisdiction. In this connection, the defendants submitted that...