收藏 分享 下载 举报 用客户端打开
Seeing philosophy as conversation with a number of fruitful avenues of discourse, Rorty seems to be caught in limbo, unwilling to follow through or commit himself to any particular line of discourse for fear of closing himself off to alternative discourses. Choosing to adopt this particular ...
…Rorty (1931–2007), who claims (inPhilosophy and the Mirror of Nature[1979] and other works) that the Cartesian demand for certain knowledge of an objectively existing world through representative ideas is a holdover from the mistaken quest for God. That is, whereas certain knowledge of God...
This change in contemporary philosophy came in Richard Rorty’s Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979). In it, Rorty argued that philosophy as a method should be removed from its high pedestal and should eschew its role as the adjudicator and arbiter of disputes among other intellectual ...
当当网图书频道在线销售正版《【预订】Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature》,作者:Rorty,出版社:。最新《【预订】Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature》简介、书评、试读、价格、图片等相关信息,尽在DangDang.com,网购《【预订】Philosophy and the Mirror of Natu
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature H Ruja,R Rorty - 《Philosophy & Phenomenological Research》 被引量: 4335发表: 1981年 Philosophy and the mirror of Rorty They all agree that philosophers are simply people who are unusually smart and need to knownothing Oakeshott, however, when writing, define...
Rorty’s publications includePhilosophy and the Mirror of Nature(1979),Consequences of Pragmatism(1982), andContingency, Irony, and Solidarity(1989).
Neither of them is Rorty’s novelty, but the way he stresses them is unique. The first is a central presupposition of his Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979), while the other is the argumentative base of Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (1989). I will argue that the distinctions...
It is the cornerstone of Rorty's argument in Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature and perhaps not so immediately relevant to the kinds of things that we think about in doing literary theory.它是Rorty在，《哲学与自然之镜》中论点的基石，或许与那些我们在研究文学理论时思考的问题，不是那么的密切...