We then suggest viewing in bello proportionality through the prism of virtue ethics.doi:10.1080/15027570.2022.2131104Stephen de WijzeDaniel StatmanRaanan Sulitzeanu-Kenan
The principles of necessity and proportionality in jus ad bellum have a long history associated with the history of the regulation of the resort to force over the years. In just war theory, necessity, in the sense that war is a last resort when other means have failed to achieve the object...
Nevertheless, the principles of necessity and proportionality, as well as the Nicaragua Casedecision In the case of cyber attack, the only workable precau... DK January - 《Resources.infosecinstitute.com》 被引量: 0发表: 0年 International humanitarian law applied to cyber-warfare: Precautions, ...
A Theory of Jus in Bello ProportionalityThe law of armed conflict prohibits attacks 'which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, odoi:10.1093/oso/9780198796176.003.0009Haque, Adil Ahmad...
This essay draws on jus in bello analogies to analyze UN sanctions via standard ethical criteria of effectiveness, necessity and proportionality. It shows that UN sanctions did not fulfill the effectiveness criterion as they were never likely to result in the denuclearization of North Korea. The ...
Contrary to the common claim that jus in bello proportionality is an obscure and intractable principle of modern warfare, this paper shows that proportionality balancing has a central role to play in assuring efficient military operations with a minimum number of casualties. Military commanders can ...
Law of Armed ConflictProportionalityIHLLOACJust WarThe principle of proportionality in international law operates both in the law on the resort to force – or jus ad bellum – and the law that governs how wars areSocial Science Electronic Publishing...
Can Just Wars Be Fought Proportionately? A Critique of In Bello ProportionalityMichael C. Hawleymcollinsh@gmail.comView further author informationMichael C. Hawleymcollinsh@gmail.comView further author information
Proportionality has long been considered a pillar of just war theory, requiring that the goods achieved in an action outweigh the collateral harms it causes. In this article, I argue that the in bello principle of proportionality cannot serve its intended function of limiting the destructiveness of...
Hamutal Esther Shamash.How Much is Too Much?An Examination of the Principle of Jus in Bello Proportionality.Israel Defense Forces Law Review. 2005 -2006Hamutal Esther Shamash. How Much is Too Much? An Exam- ination of the Principle of Jus in Bello Proportionality [J]. Israel Defense Forces ...