Preserving the quality of scientific research: peer review of research articles. In: De Silva PUK, Vance CK, eds. Scientific Scholarly Communication. New York: Springer; 2017:73-99.Silva P, Vance CK. Preserving the quality of scientific research: peer review of research articles. In: ...
ResearchOpen Access26 Feb 2021npj Digital Medicine Volume: 4, P: 39 The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals To increase transparency in science, some scholarly journals have begun publishing peer review reports. Here, the authors show how this po...
Research Integrity and Peer Review occupies a unique niche in the open-access field as the only journal covering all aspects of integrity in research ...
Research Integrity and Peer Review occupies a unique niche in the open-access field as the only journal covering all aspects of integrity in research ...
The process of peer review is where 2-4 experts in a field will analyze a paper and determine if it is ready for publication. They can contribute to the editing process by asking specific questions tailored to the research so that it encompasses the idea fully....
考虑re-review是否有必要,re-review对于review来说比research articles 更加稀少。 四, 我评审了之后会发生什么? 编辑会等待有足够的review之后,返回修改意见。 作者会回复修改意见 编辑会决定要不要re-review 编辑最终决定Accept or rejection 五, 10个 dos & don'ts of peer reviewing a review article ...
Oncotarget (a primarily oncology-focused, peer-reviewed, open access journal) aims to maximize research impact through insightful peer-review; eliminate borders between specialties by linking different fields of oncology, cancer research and biomedical sciences; and foster application of basic and clinical...
How to peer review Evaluating the discussion and conclusion In the Discussion and Conclusion sections, authors should interpret the results, place them in context of previous findings, and explain what they mean for future research, as well as for possible real-life applications. If the author ...
根据第一段中Journal-based peer review... is generally held up as the quality assurance mechanism for research.以及It claims to be an essential measure which prevents publishing faulty papers.可知,基于期刊的同行评议,即将一篇科学研究论文交由同一领域的其他专家审查的过程,通常被视为研究的质量保证机制,...
https://figshare.com/articles/Making_peer_review_free_and_open/1580088 但是，目前的同行评审模式...