peer-review publicationdisseminsationmethodsBackground: Qualitative research is appearing with increasing frequency in the public health and medical literature. Qualitative research in combination with a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach can be powerful. However little guidance is ...
Research Integrity and Peer Review occupies a unique niche in the open-access field as the only journal covering all aspects of integrity in research ...
Peer Review reports From: Exploring the subjective experience of researchers and co-researchers with lived experience of psychosis high risk states: a qualitative analysis within a participatory research process Original Submission 16 Jun 2024 Submitted Original manuscript 20 Jun 2024 Author responded ...
Journal peer review regulates the flow of ideas through an academic discipline and thus has the power to shape what a research community knows, actively investigates, and recommends to policymakers and the wider public. We might assume that editors can identify the ‘best’ experts and rely on t...
Research Integrity and Peer Review volume 7, Article number: 3 (2022) Cite this article 15k Accesses 17 Altmetric Metrics details Abstract Background Structured, systematic methods to formulate consensus recommendations, such as the Delphi process or nominal group technique, among others, provide the ...
(2001). Publishing qualitative adult education research: A peer review perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 33(2), 163.Taylor, E. W., & Beck, J., & Ainsworth, E. (2001). Publishing qualitative adult education research: A peer review perspective. Studies in the Education of ...
Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research It is often argued that interdisciplinary research is valued less in both qualitative (peer-review based) as well as in quantitative (bibliometric) assessm... EJ Rinia,TNV Leeuwen,HGV Vuren,... - 《...
But in fact, the Review formally commissioned qualitative research and integrated perspectives of transgender patients and their clinicians. In addition, the Yale Critique’s and N24’s discussions omitted consideration for patient-centered outcomes that may be valued by the child or adolescent’s ...
Our study’s qualitative and quantitative results suggest that the respondents have a general interest towards open and non-anonymous review processes. However, more than half of the respondents would nevertheless not consider signed reviews for other tracks of CHI. This might be due to the risk ...
The diversity of expectations for peer review is even bigger if we consider the variation between research fields. It is easy to slip into the research equivalent of ethnocentrism: to think that all research fields basically work like our own—or would be better off if they did. The editorial...