What is peer review - The basics and guidelines for authorsSneha Kulkarni
Ifor Williams Professor Emory University Emma Wilson Assistant Professor University of California Riverside Li Chin Wong Postdoctoral Fellow NYU School of Medicine Hanpeng Xu Associate Professor Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, PR. China ...
Peer reviewers are responsible for ensuring any references included within their report are accurate and verifiable. Further information on ethical peer review issues and conflicts of interest can be found in theCOPE guidelines.
Guidelines for Peer-reviewers » Guidelines for Peer-reviewers What is Peer Review? Reviewer Training Program Writing a Peer Review Re Review Frequently asked Questions for Peer Reviewers Peer Reviewer User Manual Register to become a peer-reviewer 95317 Papers Published Submit new manuscript Login...
There are clear indicators that the submission and/or peer review process for these papers was manipulated. These indicators include but are not limited to submission patterns consistent with the use of paper mills, collusion between authors and reviewers during the review process, inappropriate subject...
Peer review also serves those doing research, especially junior researchers and students, in selecting information, as they are able to choose between different brands. In this way, peer review supports the power of selection of researchers and is important in the acquisition of scientific ...
Discover information, resources, and training to help make the peer review process more seamless. Join the discussion to let us know why you review. Read more detailed information for peer reviewers. Sign up to get blog posts to your inbox ...
Along with removing names and affiliations under the title within the manuscript, other steps need to be taken to ensure the manuscript is correctly prepared for double anonymized peer review. The key points are: Use third person to refer to work the authors have previously published. For example...
For journals that use double anonymized peer review, the identities of both reviewers and authors are unknown each other throughout the review. To facilitate this, authors must ensure that their manuscripts are prepared in such a way that they do not reveal their identities to reviewers, either ...
An examination of social cognitive career theory (SCCT; R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, & G. Hackett, 1994, 2000) factors contributing to the college expectations of high school students (N = 87) in rural Appalachia was conducted. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed support for the...