Guidelines for Peer Review. A Survey of International PracticesThe chapter examines the guidelines and recommendations adopted by a number of international institutions in order to manage the peer review process. These guidelines refer to research quality criteria, indicators and metrics, operation...
Re Review Frequently asked Questions for Peer Reviewers Peer Reviewer User Manual Register to become a peer-reviewer 95317 Papers Published Submit new manuscript Login to view existing manuscript status Favored Authors We offer real benefits to our authors, including fast-track processing of papers...
Peer reviewers must not enter unpublished manuscript files, images or information into public databases or tools that do not guarantee confidentiality, are accessible by the public and/or may store or use this information for their own purposes (for example, generative AI tools like ChatGPT). Peer...
DovePress–PeerReviewGuidelinesGuidelinesforPeer-reviewersAllpaperssubmittedtoDoveMedicalPressaresubjecttopeerreview.Peerreviewersshouldprovideanobjectivecriticalevaluationofthepaperinthebroadesttermspracticable.ReviewersneedtomakearecommendationtotheEditor-in-Chiefbydecidingonarankbetween1-9,where1iswell-writtenand9needs...
56 57 58 6 59 60 For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml Page 7 of 18 BMJ Open 1 2 3 Duration of treatment 4 5 The duration of treatment for each CRRT session in both groups will be a maximum of 72 hours (Figure 1). 6 7 After that, ...
Ifor Williams Professor Emory University Emma Wilson Assistant Professor University of California Riverside Li Chin Wong Postdoctoral Fellow NYU School of Medicine Hanpeng Xu Associate Professor Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, PR. China ...
Use large language models such as ChatGPT for peer review; we value your judgement. Moreover, the use of any publicly available tools may compromise the confidentiality of the manuscript.How to reviewFor the first-time reviewer, start by reading the manuscript and have a blank sheet of paper...
Peer reviewers should assess papers exclusively against the journal’s criteria for publication. The following conventions should be respected: Reviewers should review the peer review policy of the Journal before revealing their reviewer role. Reviews should be conducted objectively. ...
Along with removing names and affiliations under the title within the manuscript, other steps need to be taken to ensure the manuscript is correctly prepared for double anonymized peer review. The key points are: Use third person to refer to work the authors have previously published. For example...
For journals that use double anonymized peer review, the identities of both reviewers and authors are unknown each other throughout the review. To facilitate this, authors must ensure that their manuscripts are prepared in such a way that they do not reveal their identities to reviewers, either ...