Evaluator 2 judged the quality of 2 out of 153 summaries as low, which renders pr (no Evaluator 2) ≈ 0.0131532 ≈ 0.013. Subsequently, the combined probability of agreement by chance (p(e)) is calculated as 0.9
Generalization&Usefulness contains all data we used in this part and the results from model(M), developers(A1,A2,A3) and Evaluator.Citation@Inproceedings{chen2020unblind, author = {Chen, Jieshan and Chen, Chunyang and Xing, Zhenchang and Xu, Xiwei and Zhu, Liming and Li, Guoqiang and Wang...
The full evaluation protocol is provided in Appendix A (expert evaluator copy) and B (end user evaluator copy). Table 1. The evaluation instrument. Task groupEvaluation questionResponse type/scale† Task 1: Evaluation of the website hosting the system Q.1 Based on the information provided on...
Word2Vec with the SG architecture performed the highest score, regardless of the evaluator (1.469 and 1.200). Interestingly, GloVe computed the closest to 1 cosine distance in averages (0.884 on the top 5 terms to each of the 112 given concepts, indicating the highest similarity), whereas ...
indistinguishable from that of a human. For the machine to pass the Turing test,it must generate human-like responses such that a human evaluator would not be able to tell whether the responses were generated by a human or a machine (i.e., the machine’s responses are of human quality)...
In other cases, it’s practical to defer the decision to a human evaluator if the machine is not sure of its classification decision. Finally, there could also be scenarios where the learned model has to change with time and newer data. We’ll discuss some solutions for such scenarios in ...
Word2Vec with the SG architecture performed the highest score, regardless of the evaluator (1.469 and 1.200). Interestingly, GloVe computed the closest to 1 cosine distance in averages (0.884 on the top 5 terms to each of the 112 given concepts, indicating the highest similarity), whereas ...