The compiler in Ruby is able to tell a few important things about this code. First, we’re calling a method on an arrayliteralwhich means that we’re guaranteed that themaxmethod will be sent to an array object. Second, we know statically that we’re calling themaxmethod. Third, themax...
46:40 : a in line or a value an expression can 46:47 : also be a function that looks like this 46:50 : and this guy can have spaces in them 46:53 : whereas we're using spaces to separate 46:56 : the values right now it visually it 47:03 : looks a little jarring that only...
2.1.492 MathML 2.0, Section 3.5.4, Entry in Table or Matrix (mtd) 2.1.493 MathML 2.0, Section 3.5.5.4, Specifying alignment points using malignmark 2.1.494 MathML 2.0, Section 3.6.1, Bind Action to Sub-Expression (maction) 2.1.495 Section 12.6, DDE Connections 2.1.496 Sec...
syntactically unambiguous but the only ambiguity I can see is if "x" can be parsed as both a variable-of-a-reference-type and as a value-type, AND y is one of the static members of Nullable<T>, AND the type of x has a method with the same parameters as the static member on ...
syntactically unambiguous but the only ambiguity I can see is if "x" can be parsed as both a variable-of-a-reference-type and as a value-type, AND y is one of the static members of Nullable<T>, AND the type of x has a method with the same parameters as the static member on ...
The code which turns strings into types has to be robust in the face of circular base types because the base type cycle detector depends on its output!So like I said, I’ve come up with a new algorithm that implements the spec more exactly, and I wanted to test it out. Rather than ...