A systematic review of peer review for scientific manuscripts The themes in our search included the structure and process of the peer-review system, the criteria for papers, ethics, and the different forms of the... BP Larson,KC Chung - 《Hand》 被引量: 15发表: 2012年 Academic Excellence:...
Science in now constrained primarily by the number of research posts and the amount of research funds available.doi:10.1002/stem.5530130517David GoodsteinJohn Wiley & Sons, LtdSTEM CELLSGoodstein D, 1995. Ethics and peer review. Nature Biotechnology, 13(6): 618....
A good deal has been written on the ethics of peer review, especially in the scientific and medical literatures. In contrast, we are unaware of any articles on the ethics of peer review in bioethics. Recognising this gap, we evaluate the extant proposals regarding ethical standards for peer re...
In: Finder SG, Bliton MJ (eds) Peer review, peer education, and modeling in the practice of clinical ethics consultation: the Zadeh project. Springer, Cham, pp聽47-61Frolic A, Rubin S (2018) Critical self-reflection as moral ... A Frolic,SB Rubin 被引量: 0发表: 2018年 telling about...
ethics professionalmanuscripts medicalpublishing...doi:10.2298/AOO0202095VLjiljana Vukovi-DekiInstitute of Oncology Sremska KamenicaArchive of oncologyVu~kovi}-Deki} Lj. Peer review system - professional ethics. Arch Oncol, 2002; 10: 95-97.
Current processes of peer review seemed insufficient to reassure RECs about the scientific quality of applications they were asked to review.Conclusions:This study provides evidence that scientific issues are frequently raised in letters to researchers and are often considered a quality problem by RECs....
Peer review is fundamental in ensuring the integrity of the scientific publication process and can flag potential misconduct at an early stage. COPE has developed ethical guidelines for peer reviewers which can be used as a reference for providing guidance to peer reviewers. ...
peer reportinglocus of controlThe purpose of this study was to investigate the ethics of peer reporting in Chinese societies. Based on a review of the literature, we develop a framework that explains peer reporting behaviour in terms of the individual's ethical ideology, locus of control and ...
The Editor-In-Chief is responsible for ensuring that the peer review process is conducted fairly, without bias, and in a timely manner. To uphold these standards, research articles should undergo a rigorous peer review process. Additionally, the Editor-In-Chief should be proactive in managing ...
Elsevier supports clinical trial transparency. For relevant journals, authors are expected to conform to industry best standards in in clinical trial registration and presentation, for example the CONSORT guidelines, as further set out in the policies of the relevant journal. ...