Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute: The Titantic of Worst Supreme Court DecisionsForum Selection ClausesCivil ProcedureConsumer ProtectionSupreme CourtCertain law reviews recently have collected essays from various academic scholars opining on the Supreme Court's finest decisions ever, and the ...
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute: Clauses in non-negotiated form contracts that designate a certain forum for any related legal disputes generally allow that forum to exercise personal jurisdiction over the parties, barring any issues regarding a lac
[4] We adopt the "but for" test of Shute v. Carnival Cruise Lines, 863 F.2d 1437 (9th Cir.1988), withdrawn, 872 F.2d 930 (1989), and hold that there is sufficient connection between the Shutes' claim and Carnival's Washington contacts to support long-arm jurisdiction under RCW 4.28...
In Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, the Court said, in effect, that federal courts should enforce a forum-selection cause even if the clause looks like, acts like, and is, part of an adhesive consumer contract. Carnival Cruise Lines was an easy case. It was based on the humblest...
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute: The Titanic of Worst Decisions Certain law reviews recently have collected essays from various academic scholars opining on the Supreme Court's finest decisions ever, and the rationales ... LS Mullenix - 《Social Science Electronic Publishing》 被引量: 0发...
In Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, decided in 1992, the Supreme Court extended The Bremen to this context. The Court thus enforced an exclusive forum selection clause printed on the back of a cruise line ticket and required a plaintiff to bring suit in Florida even though she was a...