公司所有与公司经营分离原则,是美国学者Berle和Means于1932年在《现代公司和私有财产》书中系统地分析了在公众公司中存在的公司所有与经营分离的这一现象之后确立的。根据公司所有与公司经营的关系,Berle与Means把公司的控制形态,概略地分为五类:1...
aattention in this important matter.[translate] a我会一值等下去,哪怕没有结果 正在翻译,请等待...[translate] a孩子们很单纯天真。 Children very pure naive.[translate] aBerle and Means (1932) expounded on Smith’s work and 在史密斯的工作和手段(1932年)阐明的Berle和[translate]...
伯利和米恩斯(Berle and Means,1932)以及詹森和梅克林(Jensen and Meckling, 1976)认为公司治理应致力于解决所有者与经营者之间的关系,公司治理的焦点在于使所有者与经营者的利益相一致。法马和詹森(Fama an…
berle和means的参考文献berle 英文回答: Berle and Means. Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means, in their influential 1932 book _The Modern Corporation and Private Property_, argued that the rise of large, publicly traded corporations had led to a separation of ownership and control. In traditional firms,...
实践证明, 公司治理的逻辑起点已从 Berle 和 Means(1932) 及 Jensen 和 Meckling(1976)的分散股权、 Shleifer 和 Vishny(1986, 1997)[3]更为复杂的终极控制权和现金流权分离的终极控制模式。 终极控制及其引发的公司治理问题成为各界关注的焦点, 如何通过优化公司治理来规范终极控制股东行为就成为亟待解决的关键问题...
自Berle和Means(1932)提出所有权和控制权分离假设以来,berle and means,所有权和控制权,所有权与控制权分离,berlebach,土地所有权,所有权与控制权状况,milton berle,所有权,管理员取得所有权,房屋所有权 文档格式: .doc 文档大小: 159.5K 文档页数: 11页 ...
aA Literature Review of Enterprise Environmental Technology Innovation A Literature Review of Enterprise Environmental Technology Innovation[translate] aSeveral studies suggest that Berle and Means’ (1932) model of 正在翻译,请等待...[translate]
内容提示: Title of article Author(s) Authors’ biographies Corporate Governance Reform: A Social Constructionist Approach to Recurring Problems under Agency Theory’s Influence Charl du Plessis Charl du Plessis holds a PhD candidate in Business Ethics from the Darden Graduate School of Business and ...
Berle and Means revisited: The governance and power of large U.S. corporations In The Modern Corporation and Private Property (1932), Berle and Means warned of the concentration of economic power brought on by the rise of the large co... MS Mizruchi - 《Theory & Society》 被引量: 266发...