公司所有与公司经营分离原则,是美国学者Berle和Means于1932年在《现代公司和私有财产》书中系统地分析了在公众公司中存在的公司所有与经营分离的这一现象之后确立的。根据公司所有与公司经营的关系,Berle与Means把公司的控制形态,概略地分为五类:1...
berle和means的参考文献berle 英文回答: Berle and Means. Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means, in their influential 1932 book _The Modern Corporation and Private Property_, argued that the rise of large, publicly traded corporations had led to a separation of ownership and control. In traditional firms,...
伯利和米恩斯(Berle and Means,1932)以及詹森和梅克林(Jensen and Meckling, 1976)认为公司治理应致力于解决所有者与经营者之间的关系,公司治理的焦点在于使所有者与经营者的利益相一致。法马和詹森(Fama an…
aattention in this important matter.[translate] a我会一值等下去,哪怕没有结果 正在翻译,请等待...[translate] a孩子们很单纯天真。 Children very pure naive.[translate] aBerle and Means (1932) expounded on Smith’s work and 在史密斯的工作和手段(1932年)阐明的Berle和[translate]...
实践证明, 公司治理的逻辑起点已从 Berle 和 Means(1932) 及 Jensen 和 Meckling(1976)的分散股权、 Shleifer 和 Vishny(1986, 1997)[3]更为复杂的终极控制权和现金流权分离的终极控制模式。 终极控制及其引发的公司治理问题成为各界关注的焦点, 如何通过优化公司治理来规范终极控制股东行为就成为亟待解决的关键问题...
自BerleMeans1932提出所有权控制权分离假设以来 系统标签: 控制权berle所有权终极股东分离 终极控制股东两权偏离、替代效应与公司价值 ——基于2003-2005年上市公司数据的实证研究 张耀伟 (南开大学经济学院博士后流动站天津,300071) 摘要:基于2003-2005年上市公司数据,实证分析了终极控制股东两权偏离度对公司价 值的作用...
aContract is the essence of information, it reflects the responsibility of both principal and agent. If both principal and agent information is completely consistent, it will not appear the principal-agent problem. Berle and Means (1932) that the ownership of large enterprises, now that enterprise...
Our purpose is to build on the research by Berle and Means (1932), further developed by Coase (1937), Alchian and Demsetz (1972), and Jensen and Meckling (1976), among others. We investigate the impact of organizational structure on firm performance, incentive problems, and financial ...
Who own the family firms? : Berle & Means (1932) and Jensen & Meckling (1976) revisited 喜欢 0 阅读量: 73 作者:Toshio,GOTO 摘要: In response to the calls for the diversity and the longitudinal study of the family business, this empirical paper sheds light on Japanese family businesses ...