The question of broadcasting Supreme Court proceedings has come up several times in recent years. It was widely discussedlast year, when the Court heard arguments over two prominent cases affecting same-sex marriage, and in 2010, when the Court heard arguments inPerry v. Schwarzenegger, determining...
Screen capture and recording tools can potentially strengthen fair use arguments by allowing users to limit the amount and substantiality of copyrighted content used. By capturing only specific portions or brief clips of videos, users may be more likely to fall within fair use guidelines. For ...
US Supreme Court considers scope of liability for internet publishers Justices hear arguments on law that shields tech platforms from liability for content published on their sites Thursday, 16 February, 2023 YouTube chief executive Susan Wojcicki to step down ...
“The adjournment request has now been decided in the same way this Court has decided every other issue that has arisen since the origination of this case, applying the facts and the law after carefully considering the issues and respective arguments of the parties to ensure that the integrity ...
Justlike Twitter/X, YouTube's crowdsourced, unpaid fact-checking system will allow users to rate notes as "helpful," "somewhat helpful," or "unhelpful." Evaluators can also share why they believe a video's note isn't helpful. Twitter's Community Notes feature, initially called Birdwatch...
A third argument has to do with regulators. A case heard on February 21st at the Supreme Court on whether YouTube violated anti-terror laws by using algorithms that recommendedextremistvideos was met with scepticism by justices. 其三与监管机构有关。2月21日最高法院审理了“油管是否违反了反恐法律...
Supreme Court has original jurisdiction because the lawsuit was brought by one state against other states. That paved the way for Texas to timely (although very swiftly) present and argue the FACTS showing that a few election officials in a few localities committed election fraud on a scale ...
The arguments on the basis of which the injunction order was passed were: YouTube and Google profit at SCIL's expense by showing SCIL's songs for free to the public, while displaying advertising on the screen and collecting revenue from the advertisers based on the number of hits on the ...
The court’s ability to weighnuancedquestions involving technology will again be tested on Feb. 21, when it hears arguments in Gonzalez v. Google. In the case, the family of a terrorism victim claims that the company’s video site, YouTube, promoted Islamic State videos to people who had ...
Takeaways from the Supreme Court arguments on Texas’ age-verification law for porn sites 6 minute read American Battleground: Trump’s appetite for revenge — and the limits he might face 12 minute read Most read Johnson removes Republican chair of House Intelligence Committee Biden’s po...