Considering the foregoing, petitioner can be said to have only acted for and on behalf of Airward when he transacted with private complainant and when he received from the latter the amount of PHP 37,400.00. Thus, petitioner cannot be faulted when private complainant’s trip to Hong Kong, wh...
Casino Plus: How to Download and Log into GCash for Seamless Exciting New Online Casino Games to Play in 2023 Unlocking the Benefits of Nice88: A Comprehensive Guide to F Understanding XO Jili: The Allure of a Unique Gambling Exper
Considering the foregoing, petitioner can be said to have only acted for and on behalf of Airward when he transacted with private complainant and when he received from the latter the amount of PHP 37,400.00. Thus, petitioner cannot be faulted when private complainant’s trip to Hong Kong, wh...