You don't want to use sqlite, you don't have to do so. But you'll have to either go back to FF2 to achieve this, or maybe use lynx if you are prepared to abandon GUI browsing in the process. The arguments being
Yes, there are dangers with using the float if you don't know what you are doing, but there are cases where you want to use the float when you do, and it is annoying to have to create a raw query in the migration when you have the float migration type right there. Not sure how ...
I do think that there should be a fourth INTENT option, maybe UNKNOWN or OMITTED or something like that, to allow the programmer to specify the semantics of omitted intent. (Then again, I would urge programmers who want that option to rearchitect the application to not need it.) Translate...
I'm not recommending that you do any of these things -- please, do not, for the good of us all. I'm saying that it would be really nice if we could give you an ironclad guarantee that an initialized readonly field is always observed in its initialized state, ...
They do not feel "native" anymore (which is bad of course). It feels like kind of an Electron app (or worse). Do you use another GUI toolkit for the new UI? (I'm on Ubuntu and on WIndows). One general comment: I do not like the pure Icon based toolbar; the textual one was...
I designed CRecycleFile to be easy to use for dumb programmers like me. Here's how: コピー LPCTSTR pszPathName = GetFileNameSomehow(); // full path name!CRecycleFile rf;rf.Recycle(pszPathName); What could be easier than that? CRecycleFile is deriv...
Maybe java could use old idea and instead of get,set use public variables. I know its bad if you want to vlidate input, but do we really validate input that much ? plus i tought that public setSth(boolean b){ this.b=b; this.c=b && this.i==1; } was not cool and you should...
Ignore: We can ignore the return value, and therefore also ignore whether it errors. This is almost never what we actually want, and so the#[must_use]annotation onResultcauses a warning to be issued: foo(); // WARNING ManualWe can manuallymatchon the return value and do different things...
spread fals information here. The use of the class keyword over the struct keyword is only a matter of style or preference. The language has absolutely no preference for one over the other: class foo { // private elements public: // public interface ...
What my programmers are doing is creating aunique_ptrand immediately usingget()to put it into a local raw pointer which is used from then on. Somehow that doesn’t feel right, but I don’t know what would be the best alternative. ...