The headline and subheadline on theNew York Times analysis by Supreme Court reporter Adam Liptak complainedthat the court had taken “Trump’s immunity arguments in unexpected direction” with “very little about the President’s conduct.” And the story itself fumed that the justices had r...
Amy Coney Barrett is likely to influence the court on environmental regulation and scientific expertise, say legal scholars. Judge Amy Coney Barrett speaks next to President Trump Judge Amy Coney Barrett speaks next to President Trumpdoi:10.1038/d41586-020-02747-xNidhi Subbaraman...
Trump is currently the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination and won theIowa caucusesandNew Hampshire primary, the first two contests of the nomination process. Since Trump is likely to become the GOP nominee, his lawyers told the Supreme Court, the justices should "protect the ...
The Supreme Court’s ruling in former President Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case makes it all but certain that the Republican will not face trial in Washington ahead of the November election.
What Happened:In a potential landmark ruling, the Colorado Supreme Court removed Trump from the state's 2024 election ballot, citing his violation of insurrection, which is a provision in the 14thAmendment. At the time of the decision, an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was widely expected...
Decisions are still coming from the Supreme Court in two cases that could have major ramifications for Donald Trump: one involving the scope of charges brought against Jan. 6 defendants and one on his claim of total immunity from prosecution for anything he did as president. Former federal ...
The Supreme Court has scheduled a special session to hear arguments over whether former President Donald Trump is ineligible to be president again.
"[Cannon] has had a pattern for some time of issuing rulings that favor Trump, and it's also been expected she would do whatever she could to help Trump." David Sklansky, a law professor at Stanford Law, called the decision "not exactly a surprise" but...
attack." After a five-day hearing, the trial court found Trump "intentionally organized and incited" insurrection. Those findings are entitled substantial deference. Even though Trump himself wasn't violent, there is precedent for incitement as "engagement." The First Amendment doesn't protect ...
FILE - The Supreme Court building is seen on June 27, 2024, in Washington. Supreme Court justices will take the bench Monday, July 1, to release their last few opinions of the term, including their most closely watched case: whether former President Donald Trump has immunity from criminal ...