How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? Visit the Q&A Forum Help authors by answering these questions Question about submission via email My orginal research got 100%
So why should I care about it? Do you want to wait for a contract cheating scandal that will wound your institution’s academic reputation? If students think educators don’t care about contract cheating, then students receive the message that they shouldn’t care, either. When students think...
Answer: Thank you for your question! As you’ve identified, the difference between these three phrases is based on their describing three distinct types of relationships. “Related to” suggests that there is a direct relationship between two entities or two variables, but does not specify...
you should still acknowledge any use of AI that you’ve used to help complete your assignment. According toLatrobe University, one example of an acknowledgmentlooks like the following: Whilst/While the writing is my own and I take responsibility...
B) Do students have access to Turnitin similarity reports before final submission of work? 8). Please provide us with any examples of best practice or relevant information you would like to share on the delivery of academic misconduct / integrity support for your students. Yours faithfully, ...
From what I can understand from the status, your manuscript is yet to undergo the initial admin check and an editor has not been assigned yet.
Academic integrity is more than a policy to uphold at your institution. While academic integrity should be addressed in honor codes, it is also important to understand its meaning and uphold it at all levels, from explicit instruction to formative feedback to final assessment. Academic ...
the Introduction and Discussion sections of existing papers in the subject area to identify such gaps. Apart from a study of the existing literature, you may also be able to identify research gaps based on your own analysis of the problem and existing literature. Thus, for your present subject...
maximum similarity. If it's the Methods section, you need not worry, but if there's duplication in the results or discussion, you should definitely rework those sections before you submit the paper to the journal. Related reading: How much do journal editors rely on plagiarism detection ...
and the status changed to ‘The original 2 reviewers were invited.’ Later, the status changed to ‘One reviewer responded.’ However, the status has not changed since then (for over a week). I assume the second reviewer will not be proceeding with the second review....