”they saidin a statement. “This supplemental notice will provide a more meaningful opportunity for public comment by clarifying that EPA’s proposal is to permanently repeal the 2015 WOTUS rule because that rule was illegal in multiple respects...
Information on the criminal charges against the professor; Reasons given by the university for the dismissal of the professor; Response of the university to the conclusion of the AAUP.S. Walsh... S Walsh 被引量: 1发表: 2003年 California Federal Judge Remands WOTUS Rule While Questioning Vaca...
“The 2015 WOTUS rule was an illegal effort to assert control over private property – and we fought to have it repealed – but it also needs to be replaced, and today’s action is the last step in that process,” said National Cattlemen’s Beef Association President Jennifer Houston in...
But with the most recent Supreme Court decision on jurisdictional Waters of the United States (WOTUS) and the 2023 Conforming Rule, the answer to the question of which waters are relatively permanent has increased in importance and urgency. One state where this question is salient is Arizona, ...
NSSGA and member companies opposed the 2015 WOTUS rule that would have allowed the federal government to regulate waters that have little or no connection to flowing rivers and made permitting much more difficult and costly for members. NSSGA Submits WOTUS Comments Dovetailing its outreach is the ...