Justices of U.S. Supreme Court Consider What Law Governs Plain Error AppealsAtkins, Kimberly
JUSFA JUSFC JUSFTA JUSMAG JUSMAGG JUSMAGTHAI JUSMAP JUSMG JUSMMAT JUSO JUSP JUSPAC JUSPAO JUSS JUSSC JUST JUSTACT JUSTAS JUSTEC JUSTEIS justice JUSTINTAC JUSTIS JUSTNET JUSTSAP JUSU JUSW JUSX JUT JUTA JUTC JUTE JUTEM JUTH
Protesters had gathered outside the Supreme Court in anticipation of the 6-3 ruling. The court went down ideological lines, with Chief Justice Roberts concurring with the five other conservative justices. Mifeprex, better known as mifepristone, is a drug that blocks the hormone progesterone, which...
The three were tapped for the Supreme Court by Trump and, during their confirmation hearings, fielded multiple questions from skeptical Democrats about their views on Roe v. Wade and whether they would vote to overturn the decision. Here is what the justices appointed by Republican presidents have...
Supreme Court correctly called discrimination what it is – wrong, regardless of the skin color of the intended beneficiary,” Pam Bondi, chair of the Constitutional Litigation Partnership and co-chair of the Center for Law and Justice at the America First Policy Institute, wrote in a ...
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act still prevents states from enacting voting rules that purposely discriminate. But proving intentional discrimination is much more difficult than showing a law disproportionately impacts minority voting. The three liberal justices on the court, led by Justice Elena Kag...
Supreme Court justices are taking the bench to release their last few opinions of the term. Here’s what to watch.
Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree. They write new content and verify and edit content received from contributors.
“Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall said that the policy of considering race in admissions is meant to ‘remove the vestiges of slavery and state-imposed segregation.'” “By reversing the laws that protected affirmative action in college admissions, the court is either saying that 1. We, ...
The majority opinion accused the liberal justices of “fear mongering” and striking a “tone of chilling doom that is wholly disproportionate to what the court actually does today.” WHAT COMES NEXT The case will now go back to Chutkan. The trial was supposed to have begun in Mar...