Following the application of the inclusion criteria, 24 articles were selected with which a random effects meta-analysis was adopted, obtaining an average effect size of 0.54. Three moderating variables were an
It is worthwhile to note a greater proportion studies utilising active learning had a shift to the right in Supplementary Material 6. This resulted in a higher standard mean difference of 0.57 vs. 0.51 however was not statistically significant. Fig. 5 Random effects meta-analysis of studies ...
A random effects meta-analysis for self-esteem and gaming disorder was conducted. Subgroup analysis investigating heterogeneity was conducted for: culture, age, measures of self-esteem and gaming disorder. Of 2496 records identified, 37 were included in the review. The quality assessment indicated a...
2003). OA is frequently defined as a firm’s ability to identify and react to opportunities, threats, and changes (Tallon et al.,2019). A prior meta-analysis has examined the connection between IT capability, OA, and
For the quantitative data, random effect meta-analyses were performed where we had sufficient data assessing the same outcome [31]. Pooling was performed on the outcomes measured immediately following the intervention. As we used a random-effects model for the meta-analyses, the weightings for eac...
13. mvmeta and mvmeta_make mvmeta performs maximum likelihood, restricted maximum likelihood, or method-of-moments estimation of random-effects multivariate meta-analysis models. mvmeta_make facilitates the preparation of summary datasets from more detailed data. 14. ipdforest ipdforest is a post...
As a digital marketer, knowing how to get your brand, website, or company found by searchers is a core skill, and understanding how SEO is evolving will keep you at the top of your game. While SEO changes frequently in small ways, the concepts of SEO do not. We can break SEO into...
Random effects meta-analyses were performed and forest plots were produced for each of the three operationalisations of education – continuous, dichotomous and categorical, for outcomes that had sufficient studies to conduct a meta-analysis (pre-determined as a minimum of five studies), however no...
For the quantitative data, random effect meta-analyses were performed where we had sufficient data assessing the same outcome [31]. Pooling was performed on the outcomes measured immediately following the intervention. As we used a random-effects model for the meta-analyses, the weightings for eac...
meta-analysis using themeta sempackage (Cheung,2014) andmsemtoolspackages (Conigrave,2019). We used random-effects meta-analyses to calculate pooled effects for each mechanism and each outcome, then conducted moderation analyses to assess whether interventions were homogenous within mechanism and ...