My thoughts on this is that, yes, it’s true that some ingredients used in so-called “cruelty-free” products were tested on animals in the past. But we can’t change what happened in the past. All we can do no
There are severalalternative methodsavailable today, and they make animal testing completely obsolete. Technology is awesome and allows us to use in-vitro testing, computer models or even toreplicate real human organs on microchips. Let's spare the millions of animals and use this new technology. ...
Approximately 225 million animals are used for testing every year. Billions have been killed in the process. ("Questions and Answers About Biomedical Research.”) How can this be allowed? Isn’t it cruel to use animals to test products for humans? Many animal rights activists say, “yes” ...
Byline: Erin Holmes Daily Herald Staff WriterHolmes, Erin
For animals who stay relatively healthy, this is likely cheaper than buying insurance. However, having pet insurance can save you money if your pet develops a severe illness or an injury requiring expensive surgery. In some cases, it could even spare you a difficult decision between euthanasia ...
To determine the safety of a certain products, many manufacturers in the cosmetic industry perform tests on animals, which is controversial. In the United States, the FDA helped form the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods, which attempts to find alternative met...
“However, there are some countries that still believe that animal testing is necessary to ensure the safety of cosmetic products, and require animal testing by law. In those cases,the national governments conduct their own tests of our products—we do not and will never test on animals ourselv...
Many items are excluded. This includes (among other things) preowned or used items; plants and animals; motor vehicles; antiques and collectibles; items damaged by a delivery service; traveler's checks, tickets and other negotiable items; and real estate or items installed in real estate, like...
It is just a death toll for the living animals involved, and useless for the purposeanimal testingis supposedly working for. The 3R’s, replacement, reduction, and refinement, are suppose to help save the living creatures in this chaotic situation. It is suppose to slowly eliminate animal exp...
“substitute” life taken to preserve another, and He allowed animals to be used for that, but God didn’t like these “sacrifices” and they were only a temporary solution, until Jesus arrived and became the final living sacrifice for ALL mankind so that animal sacrifices are no longer ...