SECTION 636(C), AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 73(B)(1) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND LOCAL RULE 73.1, THE PARTIES ARE NOTIFIED THAT A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THIS COURT IS AVAILABLE TO CONDUCT ALL PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CIVIL ACTION INCLUDING A (JURY OR NONJURY) ...
District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, UniCourt provides access to court records for the other U.S. District Court in Tennessee: the Eastern District of Tennessee and the Middle District of Tennessee. UniCourt also offers bulk access to all federal court records within Tennessee, ...
The defiant Nevada county that unleashed a Western rebellion when a county commissioner drove a bulldozer through a closed national forest road has lost its court battle to take control of millions of acres of public land from the federal government.Richardson, Valerie...
PORT ORCHARD, Wash. (AP) — The estate of a man fatally wounded in Port Orchard by a Pierce County sheriff’s deputy after a car chase has settled a federal excessive force lawsuit for $3.5 million.
The Federal Court of Australia also holds authority within the state. The party system in Western Australia mirrors that of the federal level. Conservatives generally vote for the Liberal or National (previously Country) parties, and the left wing is represented by the Labor Party and such ...
UniCourt also provides you with bulk access to all federal court records within North Carolina, such as cases filed in theU.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuitat the Lewis F. Powell United States Courthouse and theU.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. ...
In that context, the court stated that Washington's Constitution "categorically rules out 13 prior restraints on constitutionally protected speech under any circumstances. Coe, at 374-75…." 14 O'Day, 109 Wn.2d at 804. The court said nothing more regarding prior restraints. However, Coe v. ...
A state court's finding of procedural default is deemed "'independent if it is separate 693 F. Supp. 2d 1280, *1288; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17486, **5 Page 3 and distinct from federal law.'" Id. (quoting Andrews v. Deland, 943 F.2d 1162, 1188 n.40 (10th Cir. 1991)); Ake...
excluding its conflict of law principles. You agree that any legal action or proceeding arising out of or related to these Terms or your use of the services shall be brought exclusively in the state or federal courts located in the State of Delaware, and you consent to the personal jurisdicti...
5 The district court reasoned that the BLM could have chosen to regulate the rights-of-way at issue, and thus had "discretionary federal involvement." It found the BLM "acted" either (1) by not exercising its residual discretion to regulate the rights-of-way, or (2) by continuing to ...