Public access to federal court records in Washington Eastern District Court Court. Lookup PACER cases for free, search case summary, find docket information, obtain court documents, track case status, and get alerts when new lawsuits are filed.
[2] The State argues, and the trial court held, that the legislative intent in enacting the "incoming calls" exception was to limit exempted calls to those (a) of an emergency nature which (b) go through the station switchboard. We are not persuaded. While the Legislature possibly may ha...
This matter comes before the court on a motion for summary judgment from 16Defendants and a motion for partial summary judgment from Plaintiff Michael Conti. 17Although Plaintiff requested oral argument, the court finds oral argument unnecessary. 18For the reasons...
State v. Aumick,126 Wash. 2d 422,894 P.2d 1325(1995), is directly on point. In Aumick, this court held that the trial court's failure to instruct the jury that intent was an element of attempted rape was not harmless error. Aumick, 126 Wash. 2d at 430,894 P.2d 1325. Respondin...
View Full Docket Activity Report(Civil) updated: ??? 11/08 2:59 ?? EST New Case Filings: 10/26/2024 - 11/09/2024 CaseNumberFiled Calderon v. State of Washington Nature of suit:Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus - General Cause:28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)3:20...
BARBARA MAYInternational Franchise Association, Inc. et al. v. City of Seattle, 92 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE, March 17, 2015.AMAZON.COM, INC. v. Daniel A. POWERS, Case C12-1911RAJ, United States District Court ...
The Supreme Court of the State of Washington has interpreted several questions related to the provisions of the state Cleanup Priority Act (CPA) in a July 28, 2005 opinion. The decision focused on the definition of "mixed waste" and other issues of the CPA, which requires that the Han-...
U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:11−cv−01915−RMCMONROE−BEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF
Washington State Law Prohibiting Mixed Waste Shipments to Hanford Is UnconstitutionalOn June 12, 2006, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington ruled that Washington's Cleanup Priority Act (CPA) violates the U.S. Constitution's Supremacy and Commerce Clauses, and is pre...
The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One. March 29, 1962. Sharp & Bishop (McCarthy & Adams, of counsel), for appellant. S. Dean Arnold (Clements & Clements, of counsel), for respondent. FOSTER, J. Appellant, plaintiff below, appeals from a summary judgment for the respondent, defe...