And anyone needing to engage in such reflection could scarcely find a better place to start than Michael Walzer's Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. As an opponent of the Vietnam War, Walzer promised himself that he would write such a book, and it ...
In Just and Unjust Wars, however, Michael Walzer develops a powerful critique of realism through an engagement with Thucydides. This article compares Walzer's treatment with Leo Strauss's anti-realist interpretation of Thucydides, suggesting many similarities between Walzer's approach and Strauss's. ...
《社科文献精品译库·正义与非正义战争:通过历史实例的道德论证 [Just And Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument With Historical Illustrations]》作者 [美]迈克尔·沃尔泽(MichaelWalzer)著;任辉献译,出版:社会科学文献出版社 2015.2,isbn:7509763649, 9787509763643。
Arguing about War , Michael Walzer, 2004, Political Science, 208 pages. Michael Walzer is one of the world’s most eminent philosophers on the subject of war and ethics. Now, for the first time since his classic Just and Unjust Wars was published. ...
STEVE INSKEEP
Michael Walzer's Just and Unjust Wars is one of those rare books that more than deserves the glowing praise on the back of the paperback edition. 2 Because his thoughtful analysis is so thorough, readable, and well-grounded in numerous historical examples, it provides a broad basis for ...
This chapter is a retrospective of Michael Walzer's Just and Unjust Wars (JUJW), as viewed from a distance of forty years. It considers the impact of JUJW at the time, and sets it in the context of contemporaneous events, both in the world and in philosophy: the aftermath of the ...
For Michael Walzer, arguing about war is political rather than philosophical, a matter of persuasion rather than proof. His discussion of humanitarian intervention since the publication of Just and Unjust Wars tracks political events and debates, including the transformation of a debate focused on the...
Just and unjust wars. Michael Walzer. basic books, New York, 1977.doi:10.1080/10357717808444657NoamInstituteChomskyInstituteInformaworldAustralian Outlook
In Just and Unjust Wars, Michael Walzer defends the conventional theory of discrimination in war: Combatants are legitimate targets of deliberate attack and noncombatants are not. Most commentators have focused on the argument in defense of this position that appeals to liability to attack. But ...