It was found that the range of the VDD_SNVS_CAP voltage is quite large and the tester was configured to accept 1.0V..1.2V.Nevertheless there are still some boards that are failing due to this voltage being either lower or higher, meaning that the range either needs to be extended or ...
Can someone tell me, what is the lowest current consumption I can achieve for VDD_SNVS_IN, if I do NOT need any RTC's running? There is only the figure of 275uA that is when the SRTC is running. I only really need the monotonic counter, nothing else. Can this be done? Many than...
Section 50.5 of the iMX6 TRM states the following: “ If VDDHIGH_IN is present, then the SNVS_IN supply is internally shorted to the VDDHIGH_IN supply
Does the NVCC_xxx supply can be combined with VDD_HIGH_IN and VDD_SNVS_IN in IMX6ULL design? Labels: i.MX6UL Tags: imx6ull nvcc_ vdd_high_in 0 Kudos Reply All forum topics Previous Topic Next Topic 5 Replies 08-04-2019 03:52 PM 1,493 Views igorpady...
Hi, I noticed in that on the I.mx8 EVK , VDD_SNVS_0v9 rail from the PMIC is disconnected and a separate regulator is used to generate this voltage. May I know why this is so. I am designing with the imx8 and pf4210 but have limited boards space so want to reduce my BOM count...