1.创建ArrayList 2.添加或插入item 3.查找或删除item(可清空所有数据) 4.排序 5.复制 6.输出(可转数组) 7.释放(删除)arrList 通常必要的部分是1,2,6,其他部分可自由选择与组合使用。 PublicSubSortArray(ByRefarrAsVariant) DimarrlistAsObject, iAsLong, rtnAsVariant Setarrlist = CreateObject("System.Col...
Set alCol = CreateObject("System.Collections.ArrayList") alCol.Add "3" alCol.Add "1" alCol.Add "5" alCol.Add "4" alCol.Add "2" '排序 alCol.Sort alCol.Reverse Debug.Print "降序排列" DebugPrint alCol End Sub Sub DebugPrint(alColl As Object) Dim i As Long For i = 0 To alColl.Co...
My class module called 'Tree': Public a As Integer Public b As String My code Set a = CreateObject("System.Collections.ArrayList") Dim myTree1 As Tree
在VBA中,字典对象本身并没有内置的排序功能,但你可以通过编写自定义函数来实现对字典的排序。 按键排序 你可以编写一个自定义函数,使用ArrayList对象对字典的键进行排序,然后创建一个新的字典,按照排序后的键和对应的值重新添加元素。以下是一个按键排序的示例代码: vba Function SortByKey(dict As Object, Optional...
VBA ArrayList类 还可以继续扩展 OptionExplicitPrivatem_elements()AsVariantPrivatem_sizeAsLongPrivatem_capacityAsLongPrivatem_dicAsDictionaryPrivateSubClass_Initialize()ReDimm_elements(9) m_size=0m_capacity=10Setm_dic =NewDictionaryEnd SubPublicPropertyGetCapacity()AsLong'all capacity in the array, ...
代码使用了前面已学过的ArrayList对象。 使用下面的代码来测试SortByKey函数: Sub testSortByKey() Dim dict As Object Set dict = CreateObject("Scripting.Dictionary") '添加字典元素项 dict.Add "一年级",156 dict.Add "二年级",138 dict.Add "三年级",180 ...
在上面的示例中,我们使用了"System.Collections.ArrayList"作为List对象的类型。这是VBA中的默认类型,也是最常用的类型。你也可以选择其他类型,如"System.Collections.Generic.List"。 3.向List中添加元素 向List中添加元素是非常简单的,可以使用Add方法。以下是一个示例代码: ...
' Initialise the ArrayList, for instance by taking values from a range: For Each cell In Range("A1:F1") arr.Add cell.Value Next arr.Sort ' Optionally reverse the order arr.Reverse This uses Quick Sort . Solution 2: To save others from clicking the same link, here's one of the excel...
Set SortByKey = dictNew End Function 代码使用了前面已学过的ArrayList对象。 使用下面的代码来测试SortByKey函数: Sub testSortByKey() Dim dict As Object Set dict = CreateObject("Scripting.Dictionary") '添加字典元素项 dict.Add "一...
Compared to an ArrayList: early binding available, faster, type safety for ListString, does not depend on outdated .NET Framework 3.5 Relative speeds based on a series of tests, compared to using a dynamic-bounds array: Strings - ListString (early bound) 3.8 times longer; Collection 4.5...