feature2要把master上的提交合并过来,使用rebase而不是merge,这样就会不产生合并提交,在向master提交时就变成了快速向前 gitco feature2gitrebase master# 如果发生冲突,解决冲突后把冲突文件加入 index 区gitadd-u# 运行continue 以使rebase完成gitrebase --continue 步骤1:git
Pull into 'master' Using Rebase Pull into 'master' Using Merge 第五类,删除分支,如果一个分支的功能开发完成了,并且被其他分支合并过了,比如合并到master主线上,这里删掉的话可以保持整个repo的分支整洁,对强迫症患者比较适用,实际上不删除也没什么影响。编辑...
1. “pull into current using rebase”的含义 “pull into current using rebase”是Git中的一个操作,它将远程分支或另一个本地分支的更改拉取(fetch)到当前分支,并通过变基(rebase)的方式将这些更改应用到当前分支的顶部。这样做可以创建一个线性的提交历史,使得项目的历史更加清晰和易于理解。与合并(merge)相比...
Part 1: Understanding Rebase 1.1 What is Rebase? Rebase is a version control operation that allows you to integrate thechanges from one branch into another by moving or combining a sequence of commits. It is an alternative to the traditional merge workflow and is mainly used to maintain a cle...
Now, save and close the editor; this will start the interactive rebase. Git skips the first rebase command, pick 1fc6c95, since it doesn't need to do anything. It goes to the next command, squash fa39187. Since this operation requires your input, Git opens your text editor once a...
Merge Select into Current 是将本地的dev分支合并到当前分支,整个过程不涉及远程代码 Pull into Current using merge 是将远端dev代码拉取到本地dev分支,再将dev合并到当下分支,在合并前有个更新的操作 查了相关资料官方给了解释: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-266647 ...
As part of our workflow we want to rebase rather than merge into our main develop/master branch, however through Stash there is only an option to merge a pull request which means we need to make sure all pull requests are rebased before the merge. It would be nice to be able to choos...
In regular merge it it useful to merge timestamps in the PO file, but this often causes issues in rebase (because the commits become different) or squash (because it can apply changes before they should be applied). Fixes #13828 fix(git): avoid using custom merge driver in rebase or ch...
When you perform a git rebase operation, you're typically moving commits around. Because of this, you might get into a situation where a merge conflict is introduced. That means that two of your commits modified the same line in the same file, and Git doesn't know which change to apply...
Let the GitHub API merge your PRs using merge commits, not ideal if you prefer linear histories Let the GitHub API merge your PRs using the "squash" or "rebase" methods, which both modify your commits, not ideal if you like your GPG signatures to be preserved Saboteur will only merge ...