How Supreme Court Ruling on Texas Could Reduce Affirmative Action across USThe Supreme Court, which has shifted to the right, may use the Texas case to overturn the 2003 decision that achieving classroom diversity could justify the use of race-based affirmative action.Richey, Warren...
Border/Lines, July 25, 2022 "In a short writ of certiorari agreeing to hear theUnited States v. Texascase next term, which involves the Biden administration’s immigration priorities, the Supreme Court declined to stay a lower court injunction that had blocked these priorities. (Yes, we know ...
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — The Justice Department on Friday asked the Supreme Court to order Texas to stop blocking Border Patrol agents from a portion of the U.S.-Mexico border where large numbers of migrants have crossed in recent months, setting up another showdown between...
court, so it ordered u.s. district judge rolando olvera in brownsville, texas, who had transferred the case, to request that it be sent back to his court. the fracas involves a technical issue but could have a major impact on spacex's case, as federal courts...
HUNTSVILLE, Texas (AP) â US Supreme Court halts execution of Texas man whose lawyers say race was factor in sentence Printable Version Email This Share 0 Latest Slideshows Church's blessing for animals NFL season: Week 4 Texans 17, Steelers 10...
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that longtime Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed should have a chance to argue for testing of crime-scene evidence that he says will help clear him. The justices, in a 6-3 decision, sent Reed's case back to a lower ...
Texas and other Republican-controlled states have successfully convinced judges todelay the terminationof Title 42 border restrictions andreinstatea policy that required asylum-seekers to await their U.S. court hearings in Mexico. The states have also secured rulings that blocked a proposed100-day mo...
Supreme Court of Texas. October 12, 1955. Rehearing Denied November 9, 1955. Greenwood & Russell, Harlingen, for petitioners. Kent, Brown & George, Harlingen, Tom H. Davis, III, Austin, for respondent. SMITH, Justice. The respondent instituted this suit to recover the sum of $22,307.94...
because such evidence has no tendency to show that negligence did cause the injury. In Bowles, we went on to say that fact issues in a case such as this are raised only by proof of probability and not by proof of possibility. In so holding we quoted from an Iowa decision wherein it ...
*464 The Court of Civil Appeals reversed and remanded the cause,[1] for the reason that it has not been proven that the act of robbery was an offense against the law of Arkansas and thus the proof failed to show that the transportation of the property into the State of Texas constituted...