16,17 Response to Public Comment A draft version of this recommendation statement was posted for public comment on the USPSTF website from September 10, 2019, to October 7, 2019. Several comments agreed that the evidence on screening for cognitive impairment is insufficient. Several comments ...
But India is on the verge of taking a major, long-awaited first step in the right direction: With the recent release of draft rules by the country’s higher education regulator – the University Grants Commission – India is moving closer to allowing high-quality foreign universities to set u...
designed the study, participated in the draft of the manuscript and made critical revision of the manuscript. Corresponding author Correspondence to Xiaoling Wang. Ethics declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Publisher's note Springer Nature ...
Data analysis, the first draft writing, and manuscript revision were conducted by CC. Material preparation and data collection were performed by RL. Both authors agreed and consented to the publication. Corresponding author Correspondence to Renping Liu. Ethics declarations Competing interests The ...
S.Y.O.; resources, M.O.R., E.V.V., A.A.V., S.Y.O.; data curation, A.M.O., M.O.R., E.V.V., A.A.V., S.Y.O.; writing–original draft preparation, A.M.O.; writing–review and editing, A.M.O., M.O.R., E.V.V., A.A.V., S.Y.O.; supervision, A....
Most comments generally agreed with the draft recommendation, although some requested broadening the eligibility criteria for lung cancer screening and others mentioned that additional risk factors for lung cancer other than smoking exist or that lung cancer can occur in persons who never smoked. In ...
AHRQ staff provided project oversight, reviewed the evidence review to ensure that the analysis met methodological standards, and distributed the draft for public comment and review by federal partners. Otherwise, AHRQ had no role in the conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and ...
Currently, a government commission consisting of poli- ticians, social partners and researchers is expected to draft a new series of pension reforms with a time horizon until 2045. After more than a year of internal discussions and only a few weeks before the scheduled release of a final ...
AHRQ staff provided project oversight; reviewed the report to ensure that the analysis met methodological standards and distributed the draft for peer review. Otherwise, AHRQ had no role in the conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation,...
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: AHRQ staff assisted in the following: development and review of the research plan, commission of the systematic evidence review from an Evidence-based Practice Center, coordination of expert review and public comment of the draft evidence report and draft recommendation ...