36if((flags & NGX_HTTP_UPSTREAM_CREATE) && uscfp[i]->port) { 37ngx_log_error(NGX_LOG_WARN, cf->log, 0,"upstream \"%V\" may not have port %d in %s:%ui", 38&u->host, uscfp[i]->port, uscfp[i]->file_name, uscfp[i]->line); 39returnNULL; 40} 41if(uscfp[i]->por...
Than you have to also adjust thematomo.conffile. In this case, change the first part into: upstream php-handler { server my-matomo-app:9000; } The important thing is thatmy-matomo-apphas to be the same service name as defined in yourdocker-compose.ymlfile. ...
attempting to open the nextcloud page I receive a 502 bad gateway error and in the logs for theappcontainer I see the errornginx: [emerg] host not found in upstream "app:9000" in /etc/nginx/nginx.conf:31. The nginx.conf file has not been changed at all. Has anyone else had this ...
with an optional port, or as a UNIX-domain socket path specified after the “unix:” prefix. If a port is not specified, the port 80 is used. A domain name that resolves to several IP addresses defines multiple servers at once.
In order for this parameter to work, it is necessary to specify the resolve parameter for the server and specify a hostname without a port number. If the service name does not contain a dot (“.”), then the RFC-compliant name is constructed and the TCP protocol is added to the ...
- * Wait for the time needed to complete the bulk assert in - * mtk_pcie_setup for EN7581 SoC. + * The controller may have been left out of reset by the bootloader + * so make sure that we get a clean start by asserting resets here. */ + reset_control_bulk_assert(pcie->soc-...
imnotwannafire commentedon Aug 13, 2021 imnotwannafire kgrosvenor commentedon May 23, 2023 kgrosvenor raman-m commentedon May 28, 2023 raman-m 5remainingitems Load more Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.Already have an account?Sign in to comment...
OK, I have an idea and it happens to work (but I'm not sure why): I removed the -exposed-only from the docker-gen options and it starts working. Note that: The target docker has an exposed port nginx-proxy work with exactly the same container ...
Assuming so, I believe there's always going to be a race condition (helped by but not entirely fixed by#2871) where Envoy may reuse the connection before processing the FIN. In your case it looks like you're sending HTTP/1.0 responses where the connection should not by default be reused...
Get a shell in the running nginx-proxy container using docker exec: docker exec -it <container_name_or_id> bash and inspect default.conf: cat /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf There may be reason written in the comment. In my case when I had a similar problem, nginx-proxy container simpl...