United States Supreme Court Enforces Class Arbitration Waiver in a Commercial AgreementGrindlingerGlenn S
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ___ No. 01–1491 ___ CHARLES DEMORE, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, ET AL., PETI- TIONERS v. HYUNG JOON KIM ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT [April 2...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ___ No. 21–1168 ___ ROBERT MALLORY, PETITIONER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT [June 27, 2023] JUSTICE GORSUCH announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of...
When the TCPA's private-right-of-action provision was being considered by the Senate in 1991, the bill's sponsor, Senator Hollings, expressed his "hope that States will make it as easy as possible for consumers to bring such actions, preferably in small claims court." 137 Cong. Rec. S1...
As a basis for this fee waiver, CREW asserted that its request was "likely to contribute to the public's understanding of the influence that conservative Christian leaders have, or attempt to have, on the President [of the United States]." When the Secret Service failed to timely respond ...
United States, 277 U.S. 438, 483-85 (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting), overruled by Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), and Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41 (1967). Justice Brandeis's words have since resonated throughout the Supreme Court's supervisory power ...
PUBLISH FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 5, 2023 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court IAN C.; A.C., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. --- CHAMBER OF COMMERCE...
Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: 312.741.1019 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS MDL NO. 2741 LIABILITY LITIGATION ___ Case No. 3:16-md-02741-VC THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Ramirez, et al. v. Monsanto Co., Case No. 3:19-cv-02224 MOTION ...
Third, the Supreme Court and the Eighth Circuit also have made clear that documents prepared for business purposes are not automatically ineligible for the privilege, if the documents otherwise satisfy the Rule. In Upjohn Co. v. United States, for example, the Supreme Court considered whether the...
. . . This provision is binding on the parties even if the Court employs a Guidelines analysis different from that stipulated herein." This waiver is in a familiar form that we have consistently held enforceable. See United States v. Martinez-Rios, 143 F.3d 662, 668 (2d Cir. 1998). ...