今天准备手动make原來用CODE BLOCKS写的代码的时候报了这么个错误: 1 \MinGW\lib\libmingw32.a(main.o):main.c||undefined reference to `WinMain@16' 大概意思是WinMain未定义。WinMain是windows程序的入口函数,一般来说没有main函数或者main函数名拼写错误的话会在编译的时候报这个错。我检查以后,发现main应该是...
今天准备手动make原來用CODE BLOCKS写的代码的时候报了这么个错误: \MinGW\lib\libmingw32.a(main.o):main.c|| undefined reference to`WinMain@16' 大概意思是WinMain未定义。WinMain是windows程序的入口函数,一般来说没有main函数或者main函数名拼写错误的话会在编译的时候报这个错。我检查以后,发现main应该是正确...
"undefined reference to winmain'" 错误表明链接器(ld)在尝试构建最终的可执行文件时,未能找到预期的入口点函数 WinMain。在 Windows 平台上,如果你的程序是一个基于 Windows 的 GUI 应用程序,那么它应该包含一个 WinMain` 函数作为程序的入口点。 2. 可能导致错误的情况 代码中未定义 WinMain 函数:但你的项目被...
现在假设，如下代码保存在名为main.c的源文件中：#include<windows.h>intWINAPIWinMain(HINSTANCEhInstance...
API在MINGW中提示“undefined reference to...”?比如， #include <windows.h> int WINAPI WinMain(...
undefined reference to ‘WinMain@16’ 意思为提示找不到 WinMain 函数,WinMain是windows程序的入口函数,有几种可能: int main() 写成了 int mian(),int mani…,即找不到函数。 没写主函数main() 有可能是找不到一个参数字节总数为16个的XXX函数。 建议保存后关闭编译器重开,我的垃圾code::blocks出现...
c:/program files (x86)/codeblocks/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.7.1/../../../libmingw32.a(main.o):main.c:(.text.startup+0xa7): undefined reference to `WinMain@16' collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status Process terminated with status 1 (0 minute(s), 0 second(s))...
So what can I do to fix the error? I need to declare a variable, such as int main or winmain, but I also need to include the x and y integers. I stress, you should no longer be using as it is abandonware I have uninstalled it and am back to Code::Blocks. I like the interfa...
用code::bloks编译时出现WinMain@16的问题提示如下: \mingw\lib\libmingw32.a(main.o):main.c|| undefined reference to `WinMain@16*| ||=== Build finished: 1 errors, 0 warnings (0 minutes, 0 seconds) ===| 我装了code.bloks12.11版,和minGW5.1.6; 因为最先是单独安装的gcc,所以在dos下执行...
I used the IDE to create the Class files (.cpp aand .h). The mistake I made, which caused my error was I put main() inside the automatically generated block - namespace std { ... }. Outside, I don't get the "undefined reference to `WinMain@16'" error. Easy to see now why...