To evaluate the influence of ultraconservative access cavities (UltraAC) on canal shaping and filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars after root canal preparation with XP-endo Shaper (XP) or Reciproc (RC), under simulated clinical conditions. Traditional access cavities (TradAC) were...
In three groups, traditional access cavity preparation was done (groups A) without two marginal ridges (A1), with one marginal ridge (A2), and with two marginal ridges (A3). In three groups (group B), two separate access cavities with a dentinoenamel roof without two marginal ridges (B1...
Ultraconservative access cavities in mandibular incisors had no negative impact on the filling material removal.doi:10.1155/2024/5516067Meurer Luiz, CarolineSantos Goulart, Taynarada Silva Magalhes, Ketillynda Rosa Souza Junior, GilmarGarcia, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti...
The lowest mean fracture force was found for the conventional access cavity group without two marginal ridges (N). Conclusion. In the condition of this study, with two separate access cavities in mandibular molars and maintenance of the marginal ridges, it is possible to provide teeth with ...
The difference between the palatal and buccal roots was not significant, but there was a significant difference among the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the root canal.Conclusion:Ultraconservative access cavities have a significant impact on the increase in surface area of the root canal ...
(1812.8 ± 263.9 N), respectively. The lowest mean fracture force was found for the conventional access cavity group without two marginal ridges (399.4 ± 95.2 N).Conclusion. In the condition of this study, with two separate access cavities in mandibular molars and maintenance of the ...