So fix the off-by-one bounds check in rds_recv_track_latency() to prevent a potential crash in rds_cmsg_recv(). Found by syzcaller: === UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in net/rds/recv.c:585:39 index 4 is out of range for type 'u64 [4]' CPU: 1 PID: 8058 Comm: syz-exe...
Dear Intel Engineers, It seems the error I got previously (see ) has multiplied. I was able to work around it as previously: *to prevent
Here's a list of all the module errors: $ sudo dmesg | grep 'UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in' [ 5.288676] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in /build/linux-K8MOYl/linux-6.5.4/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c:4667:12 [ 5.288961] UB...
[ 5.044159] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in /build/linux-oem-6.5-XiW3QL/linux-oem-6.5-6.5.0/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c:6666:21 [ 5.046013] index 1 is out of range for type 'MPI2_SAS_IO_UNIT0_PHY_DATA [1]' [ 5.047061] CPU: 2 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/u8:7 ...
选择提交可以进行 Cherry Pick Cherry Pick 提交于 2024-03-19(1) UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in dtSplitRoot c246bf1c Osama Muhammad 提交于 9 个月前 没有更多了 审查 审查人员 +1 最少人数 0 测试 未设置 最少人数 0 优先级 不指定 标签 openeuler-cla/yes lgtm approved ci_...
index xxx out of bounds for type xxx 背景 固定长度的数组越界 错误代码实例 int array[5]; for (int i = 0; i <= 5; ++i) { array[i] += 1; // Error: out-of-bounds access on the last iteration } 影响 导致程序存在安全漏洞,并有崩溃风险。 开启UBsan检测后,触发demo中的函数应用闪退,...
Status in linux source package in Jammy: New Status in linux source package in Mantic: New Bug description: Overview: A newly installed Ubuntu Server 22.04.4 on a Hyper-V virtual machine outputs error message "UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in ...
[24232.595340] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in /var/lib/dkms/i40e/2.24.6/build/i40e_main.c:204:17 [24232.595346] index 0 is out of range for type 'u16 [*]' [24232.595350] CPU: 1 PID: 1201347 Comm: kworker/1:3 Tainted: G OE 6.5.0-44-generic #44 ...
I believe this would be an extension of container-overflow to work with arrays in addition to vectors. Right now it appears exceeding the bounds of a member variable (statically sized) array is not caught if there’s more data in the allocation after the array....
I believe this would be an extension of container-overflow to work with arrays in addition to vectors. Right now it appears exceeding the bounds of a member variable (statically sized) array is not caught if there’s more data in the allocation after the array....