UNCONSCIONABILITY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA: UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC. v HELLERdoi:10.1017/S0008197321000209Chris HuntCambridge Law Journal, The
In Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc., the Ontario Court of Appeal held that the arbitration clause contained in the agreement between Uber and its drivers was invalid on two separate grounds. First, the clause amounted to an illegal contracting out of the Employment Standards Act. Second, the ...
UBER Technologies Inc.CANADA. Supreme CourtLEGAL status of consumersRequiring low锕慳id drivers to sign an Arbitration Clause removing their right to local court processes can be unconscionable and, if so, the clause is not enforceable. This was the conclusion reached by the majority of the ...
A New Gig for Unconscionability — Equity and Human Dignity in Uber Technologies v. Heller [2020]Raúl Madden