Previously, the Supreme Court already received strong disapproval from Democrats for agreeing to hear the Trump case, which delayed a trial that could have started in March. The extended period the court has taken to address this high-profile case has aided Trump by diminishing the probability th...
WASHINGTON, Feb. 8 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday began to hear former President Donald Trump's eligibility case, with the decision poised to set guidelines nationwide. Early January, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to take up whether Trump can be disqualified from appearing ...
The case, known as Trump v. Anderson, involves whetherTrump is disqualified from holding the presidency againbecause of his conduct surrounding theJan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol. The dispute puts the nine justices into new legal territory, and their opinion could have sweeping...
Dec. 13:Chutkangrants Trump's requestto pause the proceedings in the case, but says that a limited gag order and an order governing the use of "sensitive" information in the case remain in force. Dec. 22:The Supreme Courtdenies Smith's bidto fast-track the immunity case and leap-frog ...
Supreme Court, Thursday, Feb. 8, 2024, in Washington. The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday will take up a historic case that could decide whether Donald Trump is ineligible for the 2024 ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana) The Supreme Court sounds ...
Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked whether the high court should think about democracy when interpreting Section 3, specifically the right of the people to elect candidates of their choice. Murray, in a lengthy answer, gave an impassioned argument that this case is at the heart of protect...
Former PresidentDonald Trumpwas removed from the ballot in the state of Colorado in a move that could have an impact on other state ballots and the 2024 presidential election. On Thursday, the Supreme Court begins hearing arguments in the case for and against Trump being on the ballot. ...
"Although we agree that Colorado cannot enforce Section 3, we protest the majority's effort to use this case to define the limits of federal enforcement of that provision," they continued. Barrett, Trump's last appointee to the high court, wrote in a concurring opinion that in her judgment...
Pinterest Linkedin Lawrence: Supreme Court sent Trump case back to trial court for a full hearing on evidence July 2, 202408:53 UP NEXT 'We're fighting back': PA House speaker on how Dems stopped GOP from taking the state house 05:...
The arguments in the Trump Supreme Court case Trump's appeal pushes the Supreme Court into new territory, as it has never before ruled directly on the application of the 155-year-old clause. His lawyers are asking the justices to consider a number of issues, including whether the provision ...