The cost-effectiveness of each intervention was modelled for the 2003 Australian adult population. RESULTS: Both interventions resulted in reduced mean weight (traffic-light labelling: 1.3 kg (95% uncertainty interval (UI): 1.2; 1.4); 'junk-food' tax: 1.6 kg (95% UI: 1.5; 1.7)); and ...
Effectiveness of traffic light system on Brazilian consumers perception of food healthfulness Front of packTraffic light systemHealthfulness perceptionFood productsFront-of-package (FOP) nutrition labelling schemes were developed to improve consumer's comprehension about the food nutrients associated with non...
Impact of front-of-pack 'traffic-light' nutrition labelling on consumer food purchases in the UK. 'Traffic-light' nutrition labelling and 'junk-food' tax: a modelled comparison of cost-effectiveness for obesity prevention. Intelligent Traffic Light Control ...
'Traffic-light' nutrition labelling and 'junk-food' tax: a modelled comparison of cost-effectiveness for obesity prevention. INTRODUCTION: Cost-effectiveness analyses are important tools in efforts to prioritise interventions for obesity prevention. Modelling facilitates evaluati... G Sacks,JL Veerman,M...
The Traffic Light Food Tracker app is designed to help you sort the fat from the fiction when it comes to the nutritional content of the food you buy. The aim of the app is to demonstrate the effectiveness of traffic light labelling on packaged food. The app gives a traffic light rating...
Felicity Lawrence Thursday December 28, 2006 The Guardian 1. Consumers are to be presented with two rival new year advertising campaigns as the Food Standards Agency goes public in its battle with the industry over the labelling of unhealthy f
Other ways to drive brand marketing effectiveness Screen dominance rate SDR Closely related to e-commerce conversion According to the comparison of Double 11 e-commerce data in the same period, Xiaohongshu’s search scene highly overlaps with the top 10 brands in the Tmall beauty category, with...
The cost-effectiveness of each intervention was modelled for the 2003 Australian adult population. Results: Both interventions resulted in reduced mean weight (traffic-light labelling: 1.3 kg (95% uncertainty interval (UI): 1.2; 1.4); ‘junk-food’ tax: 1.6 kg (95% UI: 1.5; 1.7));...
2011. "Traffic-light" nutrition labelling and "junk-food" tax: a modelled comparison of cost- effectiveness for obesity prevention. Int J Obes (Lond), 35, 1001-1009.Sacks G, Veerman JL, Moodie M, Swinburn B. 'Traffic-light' nutrition labelling and 'junk-food' tax: a modelled comparison...
Cost-effectiveness analyses are important tools in efforts to prioritise interventions for obesity prevention. Modelling facilitates evaluation of multiple scenarios with varying assumptions. This study compares the cost-effectiveness of conservative sce