Critics then highlighted that, unlike much of the rest of the federal government, the Supreme Court lacked ethics rules particular to themselves despite being subject to applicable law. Political partisans will parse the new code to malign justices who do not vote with their policy preferences. ...
Rivera, AprilSouthwestern Law Review
Posted inCurrent Events,Miscellaneous,News,Perception,The Dark Side,Tyranny, taggedartificial stupidity,censorship,ethics,Facebook,Germany,I Spy,illegal aliens,law,libraries,New Jersey,New York,politicians,porn,pregnancy,robots,scams,serial killers,Shame Shame,Shifting the Blame,surveillance,Tennessee,Texas,...
The Supreme Court stunned Washington on Monday by announcing its adoption of a new code of conduct amid reports that some members accepted gifts and luxury trips from wealthy, politically-aligned individuals. CBS News chief legal correspondent Jan Crawfo
Supreme Court of the United StatesFederal courts won't ask DOJ to probe possible Clarence Thomas ethics breaches The federal courts will not refer allegations that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas may have violated ethics laws to the Justice Department, the judiciary's policymaking body says....
Beyond the Supreme Court Ruling on Alcoholism as Willful Misconduct: It Is Up to Congress to Act By the narrowest of margins in a complicated case, the US Supreme Court on April 20 upheld the Veterans Administration (VA) ruling that two recovering alcoholic Army veterans were not entitled to...
Justice Brett Kavanaugh points to the mixed decisions that emerged from the U.S. Supreme Court this term as he seeks to dispel notions of a partisan high court, He told a judicial conference in Minnesota on Thursday that the high court is “an institutio
What effect does the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling have on Donald Trump’s New York criminal case? According to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office, it has “no bearing on this prosecution.”
For example, some may see the recent Supreme Court decision to lift the prohibition on physician-assisted death as unethical (Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) 2015). Ultimately, while information about the content, process, and consequences of the law are immensely important to health care ...
We need, among other measures, a code of ethics to root out corruption and conflicts of interests, as the Supreme Court is the only judicial body in the country whose members are not bound by one. We need term limits for the justices, and congressional overrides of far-right decisions to...