We used a systematic review protocol template (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.biqrkdv6). We followed the Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 for preparing this protocol. Ethics and dissemination In this systematic review, only data from ...
In this scenario, the review protocol is developed much like a recipe that can then be executed by machine [5]. Tasks are reordered so that necessarily manual tasks are shifted to the start of the review, and automatic tasks follow. As an example, consider risk of bias assessment which som...
As previously reported, outcomes and impacts terminology, term definitions and their clear differentiation was also problematic in this review [3,8,78,87,103]. The combined difficulty of locating relevant studies using individual terms or combinations, paired with the lack of consensus and clarity ar...
The systematic review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022286208) and accepted on January 14, 2022. Study Selection A 12-person team used Covidence to apply exclusion criteria first to the title and abstract of each study then to the full text of studies not already excluded. Two ...
Use of a master protocol may address these limitations if timely assessments of efficacy are a priority. Although MSCs decreased relative risk of death at the study endpoint in this iteration of the authors’ living systematic review, no difference in absolute risk of death at the study endpoint...
We will follow the procedures described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.22The PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols) checklist has been used as a framework for this protocol.23The review is registered with the Inter...
Standard templates for each stage of the review, from protocol development to report production, can assist the review team in performing each step efficiently. Use of a report template, with minimum methodological standards, reporting requirements, and standard report sections, can assist the producer...
A systematic review was performed using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocol. We reviewed the full text of 49 studies published between 2015 and 2021. The parameters examined were the taxonomic characteristics, the type of UAV and sensor, data ...
DescriptorDiscussionEntryEssayExpression of ConcernExtended AbstractField GuideGiants in UrologyGuidelinesHypothesisInteresting ImagesLetterNew Book ReceivedObituaryOpinionPerspectiveProceeding PaperProject ReportProtocolRegistered ReportReplyRetractionShort NoteStudy ProtocolSystematic ReviewTechnical NoteTutorialUrology around ...
In such cases, if the relevant information for some items already appears in a publicly accessible review protocol, referring to the protocol may suffice. Alternatively, placing detailed descriptions of the methods used or additional results (such as for less critical outcomes) in supplementary files...