TECHNICAL writingDENTAL studentsLITERARY sourcesRESEARCH questionsThis document provides scientific guidelines for writing a systematic review article. Review papers are important in the health sciences and can help clinicians stay current in their field. There are two types of systematic ...
Revisiting resistant hypertension: a comprehensive review. Intern Med J. 2023;53(10):1739–51. Article PubMed Google Scholar Chiu N, Lauffenburger JC, Franklin JM, Choudhry NK. Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of both true- and pseudo-resistant hypertension in the action to control ...
The question to be answered in the review or meta-analysis and the hypotheses must be clearly defined and laid down in writing prospectively in a study protocol. 评论或元分析中要回答的问题和假设必须明确定义,并在研究方案中前瞻性地以书面形式规定。 2. Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria spe...
This guide is intended to help nurses with all those processes involved in a systematic review, but with a particular focus on successfully writing a review for a high quality peer review publication such as Nurse Education Today. From the outset, as is the case with any article being ...
It mentions that systematic review differs from literature review because it follows a formal procedure of analysing literature and limiting bias.关键词: Writing Abstracting and Indexing as Topic Terminology as Topic Review Literature as Topic Publishing ...
Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of first‐trimester medical termination of pregnancy performed by non‐doctor providers: a systematic review: Previous systematic reviews have concluded that medical termination of pregnancy (TOP) performed by non‐doctor providers may be as effective and safe as ...
A systematic review is a type of review that uses repeatable methods to find, select, and synthesize the available evidence.
Writing the review protocol formally will allow it to be automatically checked for consistency and logical integrity. This would ensure that the protocol is consistent, unbiased, and appropriate for the research question. Verified protocols can thus reduce or remove the need for protocol peer review ...
In this Article, we describe a pre-registered, large-scale systematic review and multilevel, multivariate meta-analysis to address this need with quantitative evidence for (1) the effect of touch interventions on physical and mental health and (2) which moderators influence the efficacy of the in...
Receiving touch is of critical importance, as many studies have shown that touch promotes mental and physical well-being. We conducted a pre-registered (PROSPERO: CRD42022304281) systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis encompassing 137 studies in